Quote:
Originally Posted by ds97
So you're not the least turned on by this image then? 
(And in case anyone thinks it looks underage: I did request for the subject to be 18 years old)
Actually, I was asking for a work by painter Vladimir Belsky, but apparently the painter was not known to the A.I. and then I got this nice (if you ask me) one... |
While that image is not bad, it's still quite a step below the A.I. art I posted earlier in the thread and it also goes back to xplondie9's point about wanting to see real women.
I was on a website looking for naked MILFs and GILFs and I kept running into A.I. art of varying quality and it turned me completely off and I ended up on a tube site looking for a completely different type of porn.
When it comes to adult material, we are ultimately looking for something to masturbate to and most people are not trying to see potentially glitchy, if not nightmarish A.I. art or experience the uncanny valley effect.
You and both agree that A.I. when done right can be amazing but we also know that it's very hit and miss, as I stated in a previous post in this thread, one A.I. art creator stated that 99% of pics are "misses" and only about 1% are good.
With a rate like that and given the fact some people never like the stuff (going back to the uncanny valley effect) I think it's best that forums such as this one, either regulate the stuff and keep it from getting mixed in with the real pics, especially when you consider the amount of photoshopped faked pics that float around this forum to begin with.