[brunettesrule]

Originally Posted by ItFigures

Just fascinating all-around. That comment about no "CIS males" speaks volumes. To make that part of the rules means that it's 90% sure one of the women, actively participating in the "club" and advocating for group sex activities, got PO'd when her male S.O. and another woman decided that they were enjoying each other's "company" in the group... a lot. They most likely cheated on the first woman which means the lying is to be condemned.
BUT, she then tears down the site across all platforms in a fit of pique, and instead of blaming herself for having taken this too far, or blaming the other woman, then decides straight guys were the problem and only gays will be "safe" to have in this club from now on.
When they re-launch, it will be with the cloak of hypocrisy: They're no longer inclusive, they're prejudiced against a whole group of people based on the actions of a few, AND: Clearly, their whole idea about nudity being non-sexual doesn't mean nature won't take its course. Even before this latest incident, they'd begun acting in more sexualized activities while insisting it was all about how nudity doesn't necessarily mean sex.
Which is true. But they forgot we're dealing with human beings here.

As far as I can tell, the group that is the subject of this thread has always been all female, the subjects in the photos have been 99.5% female, and the "Co-ed" is just some kind of ironic adjective. If the group has introduced some kind of new rule as far as men go, you can't tell by looking at the photos. I also don't see what would have changed sexually by making the group somehow exclusively female - I'm guessing that most of them are bi or lesbian anyway.