Big surprise there
Just fascinating all-around. That comment about no "CIS males" speaks volumes. To make that part of the rules means that it's 90% sure one of the women, actively participating in the "club" and advocating for group sex activities, got PO'd when her male S.O. and another woman decided that they were enjoying each other's "company" in the group... a lot. They most likely cheated on the first woman which means the lying is to be condemned.
BUT, she then tears down the site across all platforms in a fit of pique, and instead of blaming herself for having taken this too far, or blaming the other woman, then decides straight guys were the problem and only gays will be "safe" to have in this club from now on.
When they re-launch, it will be with the cloak of hypocrisy: They're no longer inclusive, they're prejudiced against a whole group of people based on the actions of a few, AND: Clearly, their whole idea about nudity being non-sexual doesn't mean nature won't take its course. Even before this latest incident, they'd begun acting in more sexualized activities while insisting it was all about how nudity doesn't necessarily mean sex.
Which is true. But they forgot we're dealing with human beings here.
|