Quote:
Originally Posted by scouty
Yes, it's that one I've used. I think it's a bad prosthetic with a nipple stuck on it. It's only visible on the left boob - maybe she's got odd-sized boobs (I dated a girl who had almost no boob on one side and a small but regular one on the other) or both are prosthetic but you see the left one because it's side-on. Trust me it's disappointing.
|
Well, where are
these caps from then, with the play button on them? These are clearly
not from the linked video. The video has a greenish-yellowish tint to it. The caps you've been posting have a reddish-brownish tint to them. And
this cap in particular somehow appears to be better quality (even at the zoomed-in state you've posted it in) and brighter than the linked video. So, how is
that possible? Again, if you are using a different video from the one that you and I linked to, I would like to see it.
I
do see what you're saying about the odd angles or curves or whatever in these caps...
but those don't appear when you watch the actual video itself, as far as I can see. In the video, it looks like a normal, real boob. Because it is. The nipple just looks off-center to you because of the angle at which she's standing. If she had fully turned towards the camera, you would have seen it perfectly placed in the center of her breast, exactly where it should be.
As far as I can tell, what you're seeing is caused by a combination of: a) video artifacting, b) glitches in the original VHS recording (of which there are many, even in the best quality available version), c) how the shadows on her skin blend in with the brown door behind her, and d) simply being an optical illusion; that actually
is how a woman's breast would appear if she was standing at that exact angle with her arm behind her. You'll notice that those lines/curves that you're seeing
only appear in the exact frames that you've chosen. If she was wearing "boob caps" (which, again, I'd like to stress,
are not a thing), they'd be evident constantly and consistently. Those weird angles and curves are being made more prominent
because you're blowing them up and zooming in so much.
Finally: if she was wearing a prosthetic or there was something truly unusual-looking about her breast, don't you think that it would have become evident to more people than just you over the last 22+ years that this scene has existed (or at least the last 10+ that it's existed in good quality)? You're engaging in conspiratorial thinking and it's ruining your enjoyment of the scene, when instead you could be appreciating the
amazing fact that Sarah Alexander took her clothes off and showed her naked body to us for nothing more than a silly joke, cheaply giving away her nudity as the visual punchline gag at the end of a dumb, disposable comedy sketch. She bravely exposed her most precious, private parts to the world just so we could laugh at them, used her breasts and bush as sources of mirth and humor, intentionally stood nude in the face of potential mockery and derision of her body.
It's funny because she's naked. It's the greatest moment in the history of sexy comedy. It's real. And it's spectacular. Enjoy it. And quit looking for problems where there are none.
(This is officially the strangest discussion I've ever been involved in on the Internet, by the way, and I've been on the Internet for 20+ years. I'm honestly not sure why I'm even engaging. I should have checked out as soon as I heard "boob caps". But I feel compelled to defend the honor of my all-time favorite video.)
Fango