Anything that pushes that boundary of non-consent/reluctance I always feel a bit ashamed of. It's tough because consent is very important to me from an ethical standpoint, but ENF by its very nature is based on what could be considered a "negative" emotion (embarrassment) which can kind of only be achieved by something happening that is outside a woman's control/against her wishes.
I think that's why my favourite ENF stuff is always the happier variety - the girls are enjoying an experience despite the "negative" consequences ie. "It feels so good that all my friends are looking at my tits, but now they're going to know I enjoyed it/they're going to know what my tits look like..."
For me, what this means is that the stronger the negative consequences (and therefore the more extreme ENF), the stronger the associated reward needs to be. So for me to feel good about a girl's nude pictures being posted online, for example, it has to be something she always secretly wanted to do and is now getting a rush out of and can't believe she did it etc. Otherwise it's just kind of horrible.
That can result in some pretty bizarre fantasies, because extreme embarrassment needs to equal extreme rewards. A way around it is I tend to have a lot of what I call "billionaire fantasies", when I have so much money that I can essentially compensate people for any negative consequences - like if I won the lottery tomorrow, I might pay one of my female friends $100,000 to strip nude in front of me, put her hands on her hips, let me photograph her nude and put it as her Facebook profile picture for 24 hours, then deal with the consequences later. Humiliating, shameful, intense, irreversible... but still done with consent for an outcome she agreed to.
I imagine owning a 24-hour cable network devoted purely to ENF, with the funds to cover legal fees/pay off anyone that gets too upset. Some of the more extreme programming would include a weekly show where we secretly install a camera in a female celebrity's shower, then reveal to her on live TV that we have the footage - and will donate $10 million to a charity if she agrees to let us broadcast it in high-definition right now as we film her reaction.
The "reverse lottery" concept is also useful when it comes to overcoming non-consent. The fantasy is a few hundred couples sign contracts and consent forms and agree to take part in a game where they are seated in the audience in a big TV studio. They agree to this because a random woman's seat number is then drawn, and if their number isn't drawn they get $50,000 and that's it. So the odds of them being selected are very small and lots of people would sign up that weren't necessarily ready for public nudity - but they've signed consent forms that mean if they are selected they have to strip, masturbate, have sex on stage and otherwise do what the audience wants to see. If they don't go through with it they will either be sued into oblivion for breach of contract, or maybe their contract specifies the show's staff can forcibly strip them and spread their legs... but that might be crossing the line a little too much. Maybe if they don't do it no one in the audience gets their $50,000, so the social pressure would mean they'd feel they have to.
Either way, definitely a fantasy I feel a bit ashamed of.
|