View Single Post
  #7817  
Old 05-14-2018, 06:27 PM
geezer5552 geezer5552 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Middle America
Posts: 176
Thanks: 31,578
Thanked 462 Times in 147 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mc.vault69 View Post
On a previous thread, some pictures of this lady arose on a Czech photo-sharing website. She is truly amazing and apparently there are hundred more out there but I haven’t been able to find them. Please look into this as she will be worth your while. I believe be most of the photos were taken by her friends but some may have been for a modelling project. Here are some pictures of her:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Masterful3 View Post
(And chef_joe)

If you pop over onto Tom Cats thread: -

https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?t=220841

there is some info there about how to separate the pics out for a search. The trouble with collages like this is that when you use a search like Google Image, or Yandex the results it throws up are often more collages in a similar format, rather than pics related to the woman you want to search. So my tip would be to split these two and try them each separately to get more results that are on subject. Good hunting.


If you use Yandex with a collage image and it returns the collage in the search results (my experience, about 70% of the time), when you click on the returned search collage image, a window opens with the image in it, in Yandex. Look in the upper left of the area, and you'll see a crop hotspot. The crop symbol is a square with extended horizontal and vertical legs. Click on the crop tool, and an area with circles in the corners shows up. Move the circles so the lighter area is a part of the collage you want to search on. I've found this is great for clothed/unclothed pics. You can segregate just the nude part, or the part that has a face, or the part that looks like it probably will have hits with a further search. On the bottom of the open area, there will be a search button. Click it and see what pops up. I would guess my return on this method is a better set of pictures about half the time.

G
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to geezer5552 For This Useful Post: