Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mcp1275
and i defy anyone to look at a girl between 16 and 20 and tell me how old they are
|
- Okay, so I've been reading of your general disatisfaction lately. You are a long-time member and a heavy contributor, so I read with great interest. Just what are you suggesting with this latest? Nobody should post anything they find in Photobucket if the girl looks to be between 16 and 20? Why stop there? Maybe we should avoid posting
all girls that look to be between 16 and 20. Or should we submit them to you for approval?
I agree completely that the appearance of teenage girls can be quite deceptive. How about this as a solution; We all continue to use the same level of cautious restraint as always about posting underage girls, and about reporting a post that we believe contains an underage girl. It's worked well so far. It don't need fixin'.
If you honestly believe the age of any girl is in question, report the post with the button provided and the Mods will deal with it (and the poster) quickly and permanently. If you don't know of any questionable posts at this time, you must aknowledge that the current arrangement is working adequately.
To help you with the NN issue, I will attach that note to my subjects when appropriate.
BUT - how shall I label a post that has a scantily clad woman giving a BJ to her man?