Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy15
My wife and I have been frequenting nudist resorts since the 1980's and we still do today. I was wondering, there is a segment of the visitors who go to these resorts not because they are nudist, per say, but for other reasons. Nothing out in the open mind you, but an undercurrent. I am not judging anyone, to each his own, but was the movement like that back in the 50's and 60's? In the magazines it seems a bit more wholesome, while today once has to be alert for possible other motives when meeting someone at the resort.
|
It depends where you go. Some family-oriented rustic resorts have maintained that same "wholesome" culture; while others, for the sake of increased revenue, adopted a more "liberated" approach. Thereby attracting people who were looking for more than just suntanning or swimming naked.
When my ex and I relocated and started looking at nudist resorts, we visited two. The first was huge, with nice amenities; but had a strong sexual undercurrent. I didn't mind the undercurrent, and neither did my wife; but at the time that wasn't what we were looking for. And after having a chat with one of the regulars there, I knew it would only be a matter of time before someone asked me if they could fuck my wife.
The second resort was rustic and wasn't quite as nice, but it was family-oriented and there was no sexual undercurrent. So we made it our "home away from home."
I'm not sure when this cultural split between resort types occurred. I remember reading an article from the 70's which was bemoaning the sexualization of nudism. So it might have started around the "sexual revolution" era.