Quote:
|
Originally Posted by susansusan
A bit of a "thinkie" post this one! We all have our favourite style of ENF. As such I thought I would divided ENF into categories and let folks post their favourite pictures from their favourite category.
Also, so time extent, there are logical links between the categories.
|
I read this with interest, since i am a classifier myself. Here is how I translate your classification into "my" language. I'm not suggesting any changes (this is YOUR post!) - so this is just for comparison on how another person thinks:
>>1. "Surprise" nudity.
translation: Caught nude with ENF. Caught nudes can come either with ENF or without. There are caught nudes with "WTF" expressions, caught nudes with "gotcha smiles", caught nudes with "OMG" reactions, caught nudes with ENF, and so on and on. Nude by choice (as in the shower) and surprised. "Surprise nudity" is not a bad term.
>>2. Accidental nudity-
translation: Accidental nudity is a broad term and the way you define it here is how I would define it, basically. But it doesn't necessarily come with ENF. The sub categories of "accidental nudity" are 1) slips (or slipouts) - minor accidents (i.e. nipslips) and by my definition, non-ENF situations. If they come with ENF, then they are 2) oops - more major accidents and ones where there is a clearly defined cause (wind, water, wardrobe malfunction). Usually with ENF but not always. A "noticed nipslip" (where the babe can be seen tucking her nipple back in) is no longer a simple "slip", but now an ENF incident and technically an "oops" or wardrobe malfunction. I know "oops" is often used on the internet for any type of slip, so this is just my breakdown...
>>3. "Forced" Nudity.
translation: defrocking or pantsing. I'm not sure which of these two terms i prefer. Defrocking seems broader. The "force" can also be an animal, but not an inanimate object (wind). Again, it has ENF and non ENF varieties. But you are right - defrocking can also be either friendly or hostile. Interesting idea to separate them......if you can!!!
>>4. Obliged nudity-
translation: I like your term. In fact, I don't have a term for this. In most cases, the woman is covering something - her boobs usually. I think there are a lot of genuine pics in this category. Often when you see a woman covered and embarrassed, the cause cannot be determined, but I'd bet a substantial number are "obliged nudity" situations. Good choice. I try to separate mine out if I know the cause. But if I don't, it just goes under "covered and embarrassed". It seems an obliged situation is any one where there are "terms" or a contract (with rules and/or rewards), clearly outlined beforehand, and the woman consents to abiding by them even if it results in her having to get naked. This would disinguish it from the next category...
>>5. Complicit Nudity-
traslation: exhibitionism with ENF. The vast majority of exhibitionist pics are non ENF. I don't even know if I've ever thought of seperating out the ones with ENF in them. Mmmm....not a bad idea. There is a fine line, though - when you start talking about "peer pressure" - it begins to sound more like a forced situation. Nightclub and flashing pics ("show us your tits!") don't often come with ENF. College games do, but college games (i.e.initiations) i would classify as "obligued nudity".
>>6. Timid/unsure flashing-
translation: Mmm....I'm not sure i fully understand the distinction between 5 and 6. Again, this is exhibitionism with ENF. Mardi Gras flashing is often "egged on" and would seem to go in number 5. Generally, if the woman is fully in control, there are radiant smiles but no visible ENF. That is unless you can deduce embarrassment from a smile. But calling it "timid/unsure flashing" seems odd, because being fully in control implies some confidence to me. I would expect timidy if the woman is being egged on, confidence if she is not. But who knows...I would like to see some examples of this, because I am not sure what to look for. Food for thought. I've never considered any of my Mardi Gras flashing pics to have embarrassment in them. I will look....
>>Moving onto category 7 would be outright exibitionism....
Susansusan, not a bad breakdown and I'm seeing some things in a fresh, new light. Nothing like actually "thinking" about your pics and comparing notes with others.
Below are two Mardi Gras pics with hints of embarrassment, judging from the smiles. "Timid flashers" is a new concept for me. So is "obliged nudity". I often see ENF pics as being a sub category of some other type of pic i.e exhibitionism+ENF, or Caught+ENF. But this is simpler and does a pretty good job of covering the bases. I noticed you did leave out simple covered pics (hidden nudity, covered boobs etc) where babes are obstructing their bods but often do not look embarrassed.
regards,
Klondike