View Single Post
  #220  
Old 10-01-2006, 09:07 PM
vidpro vidpro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 701
Thanks: 897
Thanked 2,819 Times in 368 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by msnevil

I posted my saved "contrast". Let others see what I work with. (And as always, I welcome a civilized challenge, and constructive criticism. I have been wrong in the past, and learn from my mistake’s. Lets see if others can state the same. )

What I did:
Magic wand tool>auto-leveled>local area contrast Radius 150, local area 1> manual levels, darkened highlights 50%, underlined my probable guess 50%.

I think your software doesn't produce as good of results as mine does. If you are generating results like this from primarily auto-levels and contrast adjustment, you're going to have a hard time enhancing the luminance levels. When the results are pixelized to that degree, I recommend reducing the work area (like I did) so that you don't have to exagerate the differences between so many pixels. Iv'e included a more basic example of what my software does when using just basic functions, along with the results of your auto-levels and contrast.

I went a slightly different route:

Polygon Lasso tool (focused on a more limited area) -> Contrast +50 -> Hue -20 -> Manual levels, darkened mid-range 30% -> Brightened +25, did not underline anything, did not run any additional enhancement tools I normally do.
Attached Thumbnails
rawcompare.jpg