Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vidpro
As always, no guesswork or painted-on nipples from me. Just contrast and brightness enhancement for accurate see thru depiction.
I could only see through one side, but it turned out pretty good for a somewhat blury picture.
|
Respectfully, Vidpro.
The only time guess work is not involved. Is when you can see the Visible see through with your own eye. (Which is why a lot of Photoshop people will only do Photoshop’s on "visible" aspects of the body.)
You see Photoshop is not 100% effective in illuminating what is underneath. (Contrary to what I have seen on this forum, and other's.) There is never 100% certainty. Unless you see it with your visible eye. We use different techniques to Increase our chances of noting what is not "seen". For exp. Vidpro stated contrast\brightness.
Also, I have thought about posting this in the past. But Have decided to avoid the subject. Now is the time. Some see a "nipple slip". Others "don't". The same goes with Photoshop’s. It is in the eye of the beholder. (Unless it's plainly visible. It's always guess work. )
For exp. I think Vidpro is wrong on his "guess". (Now we see how he reacts to a friendly challenge.
I posted my saved "contrast". Let others see what I work with. (And as always, I welcome a civilized challenge, and constructive criticism. I have been wrong in the past, and learn from my mistake’s. Lets see if others can state the same. )
What I did:
Magic wand tool>auto-leveled>local area contrast Radius 150, local area 1> manual levels, darkened highlights 50%, underlined my probable guess 50%.