View Single Post
  #5  
Old 06-11-2016, 04:38 PM
imaderelict imaderelict is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Op. Cit.
Posts: 682
Thanks: 1,482
Thanked 5,479 Times in 562 Posts
Default

Your explanations seem logical enough bobhawk. Putting up tents for such events would be make sense as would the street clothes in and out, and the need to shower. But as for WHICH festival ...

Not to diminish the videos you linked in the least, due to the quality, vantage point and tent layout I get the feel that is a different place and/or time but a similar situation. This of course does open the door of hope that there are scores of other festival videos just waiting to be discovered.

Regarding the number of videos in my series: The filming position was not easy to get to and required a lot of moving around.

Movement draws attention.

And its not just the camera placement but physically being there to do it, which set him up to even greater risk of discovery from both female AND male sides of the tent.

So the big question is why expose to this risk a second time?

Considering the substantial difference in the number of women, quite a time lapse is implied. My totally wild ass guess would be at least 20 minutes between them. Cutting the footage into loosely three sets of 20 minutes does make sense. Then I would think another set as the 'party' winds down, note there is no video of the camera being removed at the end.

So I hope for another 40 minutes.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to imaderelict For This Useful Post: