Quote:
Originally Posted by tuscandriver
I would say 95% of the pictures in the ENF section aren't in the least embarrassing. It seems to be more personal preference as to whether images get posted here or in the amateur section. If the test was applied fully then this section would shrink away to nothing in a matter of weeks. There just aren't enough pictures which truly fall under the heading ENF to support an entire sub-forum.
To which regard it's to be wondered why the two sections are kept separate. A lot of pictures just get posted in both sections anyway. Even when it comes to the title of individual threads you will find that 20% of all images in any one thread don't appear to have any connection to the title. In that regard this thread is actually rather good at following the title when posting pictures.
Truly the more I think about it I wonder why there are two separate sub-forums for ENF and Amateurs. Those two categories are clearly not policed and the amount of extra server space taken up by the cross posting of pictures to the two different sub-forums must be immense. This thread doesn't really feature ENF in the majority of cases and that's undeniable. However I could spend an entire afternoon listing other threads in this sub-forum which don't feature ENF in the majority of cases. By the time I had finished I would have a list of 50 or so threads listed, and I would only have covered maybe 2% of the threads in this sub-forum. If someone was brave enough, or stupid enough depending on your viewpoint, to analyse every single thread in the ENF section, I would guesstimate that hundreds of threads would need to be moved across to the amateur forum.
|
You're right that there is a lot of overlap, but I'm glad ENF is a separate category -- combining it with SA would blur the lines even more. I also think there are different shades of what we call ENF -- I have about 15 sub-folders in my own ENF pic filing system. The three basic "flavors" I identify are:
- Candid: She probably wasn't expecting to be photographed but her level of embarrassment can't be conclusively determined by her expression or body language.
- Caught: The "classic" ENF reaction -- eyebrows up, mouth open, arms and legs moving to cover up.
- Reluctant: She has agreed to be photographed but some level of embarrassment is evident from her expression and body language.
In bondage photos, we often don't get good clues as to body language and expressions --she's immobilized, blindfolded, gagged, whatever -- but there are a range of expressions that indicate she doesn't want to be photographed. It's also easy to imagine that she didn't agree to be photographed, and I'd wager that most women would be more embarrassed by a spreadeagle bondage photo going public than, say, a nude-at-the-beach shot.
Anyway, blah blah blah -- here are some not-terribly-embarrassed naked bound women