View Single Post
  #1413  
Old 04-23-2016, 07:01 AM
shoeripoff6 shoeripoff6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 234
Thanks: 211
Thanked 825 Times in 228 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleyew View Post
I don't think we should be too exacting here. The photos posted by Ival conform to 3 of the tags (I added retro):

1. mature
2. polaroid
3. retro

But your opinion is respected, and as I have said before, comments are welcome. It is good to see a bit of interaction and commentary going on here.
.

They dont look antyhing like polaroids, and the scene and and underware look like they were taken in the 21st century, which isnt vintage. There is no lack of focus and the brownish "wash" that is the feature of typical retro polaroids. These are nice sharp digital shots

Last edited by shoeripoff6; 04-23-2016 at 07:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to shoeripoff6 For This Useful Post: