[brunettesrule]

Originally Posted by acubed

As I said in my post, this is not correct. Bay to Breakers is not technically exempt from the nudity law like Pride and Folsom are.

At the same time, the police ignore the nudity or, at most, ask people to put clothes on (especially if you're sober).

From http://www.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/20...really-illegal

Reps for Supervisor Scott Wiener, who authored the law, and MTA's Cindy Shamban, who's office handles street closures for fairs ans special events, told SF Weekly that they're not aware of an application for a nudity exemption for Bay to Breakers.

But at the 11th hour, we got an email from Conor Johnston. "I checked with the City Attorney, and he confirmed by reading of the code," Johnston wrote. "The nudity ban at the police code does not apply at this event."