View Single Post
  #16  
Old 05-24-2006, 11:57 PM
thefonz's Avatar
thefonz thefonz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 457
Thanks: 1,128
Thanked 1,055 Times in 221 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red
Sorry, friend, I dispute it. I don't think this is the greatest of all time... in fact, I don't even particularly like it. It just goes to show that there are different tastes. There are at least three critiques I'd make of this clip, and here they are in increasing order of severity:

1. No nudity. Call me old-fashioned, but this still matters to me. If an entire crowd is getting to check out her goodies, I don't see why I can't either. This isn't a fatal flaw... plenty of excellent, beautiful ENF scenes have been pulled off without nudity. But all else being equal, a clip with nudity is better than one without.
I'm with you on this specific point, Red.

I also very much enjoy Fango's posts, let me add that as well.

I do understand that the 'N' in ENF doesn't always mean we the viewer have to see the full 'N'. But...I've made a couple of posts where I'd hope such scenes were labelled ECNF or EHNF where 'C' stood for covered or 'H' for 'hidden'. Whatever adjective would work - obscured, not viewable, PG, network-TV-ready, whatever. Maybe something like ENF(PG) or ENF(R) depending on the vid.

I've thought about a Sexy Vids (PG) forum and a Sexy Vids (R) forum. That way, the fans of the "pure genre" regardless of actual viewable toplessness or nudity could go direct to that forum, expectations already set, and those who prefer their ENF more caffeinated (so-to-speak) could go direct to that forum, and never be disappointed. Of couse, incorrect posts in either forum would be moved to the appropriate forum.

Just my two cents.

This is a great board and I give my appreciation to all posters such a fango for their never ending contributions.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thefonz For This Useful Post: