Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaboo
Photo of girl at tree seems like she's into it, maybe for fun maybe for pay. I feel like it is prefectly safe looking at it. The photo of girl on couch seems like it's being down agaisnt her will though she might be a great actor. It is just some photos make me concerned about where they came from. The others are okay but really should be in hardcaore
RB
Also in attachment 8 she seems to be in no apn and that she ould get out any anytime and that she is wither enjoying it or getting paid or both. so of the other photos onern me
RB
|
I see absolutely no moral difference between photographing a women without her consent while she's in the shower then posting it , and photographing her without her consent while she is tied up and then posting it . If you're suggesting that the bondage itself is non-consensual, there's no basis for that idea -- you should know that many, many, many couples enjoy bondage and dominance/submission play, and some people get off on pain and/or verbal abuse. Do you honestly think that amateur bondage photos come from home invasions or other forcible crimes? Certain other ENF situations -- such as stripping a woman in public -- are more inherently abusive than bondage. No one who enjoys this forum can claim the moral high ground by tut-tutting about stuff they don't like or don't understand.
I agree though that for bondage pix to be posted in the ENF forum, the women should be embarrassed or reluctant to be photographed. There's an active bondage thread in Sexy Amateurs for happy tied-up ladies, and of course any hardcore sex pix belong in the hardcore forum.
Here are some pix to make up for my rant.
***** PRO PIC REMOVED *****