
01-30-2015, 01:49 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 566
Thanks: 12,970
Thanked 12,519 Times in 593 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crispus
It's not a question of batch vs. individual, or not entirely; it's a question of which available size is downloaded (of course, that devolves to batch vs. individual when you realize - unless you've got a trick I haven't - that largest sizes can't be batched); what you're giving is the medium size (i.e. no "suffix") as in the first example below, while the complaint is that you don't search out and provide the best available one, which in the case of the second example is the one with "suffix" "_o"; in this example it's a significant difference but often it's a huge one, when original size is available and, say, 4000x6000 or even bigger. While in this case it would be possible, though not a little tedious, to go back to ones we like, check whether or not bigger sizes are available, then get them, in the case of ones which are f/f and to which we may not have access, it would become impossible...
|
This script works just fine with firefox, downloading full size pictures...approximately 200 images in a single pass in photostream
https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/show...postcount=1645
|