View Single Post
  #152  
Old 12-19-2014, 10:07 PM
twi53 twi53 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 120
Thanks: 149
Thanked 860 Times in 109 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anonjohn View Post
I have no information only guesses.

Based on my amateur interpretation of body language of a photo which can sometimes capture odd unrepresentative moments.

They seem to know each other well enough to be comfortable naked and close together. But I doubt they are work colleagues - I've never worked in such a friendly place! Perhaps they are from the same naturist club day out.

Assuming:
1. these are spouses (wedding rings on all 3 women and at least 1 man).

2. women are generally more modest and careful of avoiding sexual misunderstanding than men (assuming this event attracts naturists rather than swingers). Therefore I have given more weight to the women's body language than men.

Numbering the people from left to right 1(m), 2(f), 3(m), 4(f), 5(m), 6(f).

I guess:
2(f) holding 1(m) = couple
4(f) "spooning" 5(m) = couple and 4(f) keeping a slight distance from 3(m)

3(m) is being "familiar" with 2(f)
6(f) close to but not fully touching 5(m), 6(f) apparent breast position is due to her posing movement.
3(m) & 6(f) may be a couple (assuming 3 couples).

Supporting/refuting evidence would come an examination of other photos to see if any of these people were running together or showed other "tie-signs" like holding hands.

This reminds me of Eng Litt creative writing exercises at school - seeing a picture and having to make up a story. Maybe if there were pictures like this in Eng Litt, then literacy standards would improve!
4 and 5 are definitely a couple. Not only spooning, but his right hand is in close proximity to her boob. My take is that 2 and 3 are a couple, and 1 and 6 are either the third couple, or singles with the group of 4. 1 is covering his nuts, and 2 has her hands placed politely on his hip. That says to me, they're not a couple.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to twi53 For This Useful Post: