Quote:
Originally Posted by fdooby
Yep, the same. Completely agree. Have seen some frankly demented stuff being said on a few of the chans - not about this girl, and not involving my pics, but other stuff from WNBR. She appeared to be fine with people taking all manner of shots of her, including close ups, so long as they were naked  |
Indeed, she was happy to cavort with the repeat WNBR participant who wears a device in public to maintain his erection, and allow him and his pal (for whom he poses in erotic set-ups) to capture shots of her genitalia (some she faved) whilst simultaneously abusing and defaming clothed photographers who were doing no more than documenting the event.
Notwithstanding any reasonable definitions of 'pervert' and 'pornographer', the logic seems to be:
Clothed photographers = pervert pornographers
Naked 'erect' participant = not a pervert
- hXXps://www.flickr.com/photos/51205467@N04/people/30886945@N04/
Naked 'close-ups' participant = not a pornographer (despite shooting the set above & examples below)
- hXXps://www.flickr.com/photos/51205467@N04/9008007807
- hXXps://www.flickr.com/photos/51205467@N04/9007925893