Quote:
Originally Posted by clayman1280
Yup...you are right...I should have just started a thread in non fiction and asked the question.
I came to the thread out of curiosity as I have done with the peeing thread....having looked I could have moved on but since my curiosity was peaked I was trying to understand the reasons for other peoples interest. I posed a question and did not feel that it was particularly negative, more a quest for information and insight. If you were unable to give any you could have moved on....However, you felt you had to slap my wrists and belittle me for asking a question!
I am certain that a much better metaphor would be to see this whole site as the ballgame and that a particular play was not understood. I don't think any of the 'fans' would have objected to a question about about why a play was made the way it was.........except you maybe!
Now do YOU understand THAT!!
|
Yes, I do, now that you have taken the time to explain yourself. I apologize if you felt belittled, but subtle isn't always my thing. My response came from the perspective that a lot of people post negative shit on other people's threads. It irks me, because it discourages posters and just isn't constructive. I'm not the thread police, but sometimes I feel compelled to fend off people who attack things they don't understand. If you were honestly looking for insight, I think Clayman's response saying that he was interested in women and EVERYTHING about their bodies explained the fascination rather well. I love everything about women and I like to watch women do just about anything. Menstruating and peeing included.
