To put it simply: Pictures taken without the subject's knowledge are, by definition, "voyeur" pics, whether nude or non-nude, and belong in the Exhibitionists & Voyeur section. If the pictures contain upskirts, downblouses and the like, then and only then do they belong in Upskirt & Downblouse. Street candids without upskirts, downblouses, etc. would be off-topic in the Upskirt & Downblouse section because they don't
contain u's/d's/etc. Conversely, non-nude street candids
are on-topic in the Exhibitionists & Voyeur section because they were voyeuristically taken.
Frankly, I don't think this is an issue worth worrying about too much. There really aren't that many of these threads in the section and they are easily scrollpast-able since they usually identify the contents within fairly well in their titles. As far as I can tell, the non-nude street candids have limited appeal, and I don't see a problem with the few people who do enjoy them being able to post in the E&V section.
Quote:
|
To me, "E&V" is about exhibitionism and public nudity, not voyeur.
|
Yes, but that's only because that's what you post and enjoy there. Other people post and enjoy voyeur pics in the same section. Admittedly, they're a bit of an odd couple, but they get equal billing in the title. You can't have Felix without Oscar, Siskel without Ebert, Bert without Ernie...
Fango