
09-03-2012, 08:59 PM
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3
Thanks: 3
Thanked 117 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crispus
I can't say definitively, but I suspect the answer is that the duplicate of the removed picture simply hasn't been seen by a mod yet. What puzzles me, though, is why the first two iterations were unacceptable in the first place; in that vein I'd suggest that whenever possible (if the violation and/or violator aren't too egregious) a moderator removing part of a post leave some explanation, as the second excision in this thread did, namely "***** MAINSTREAM MOVIE CAPS REMOVED *****"
So as not to seem (or not exclusively!) pedantic, here are some pictures relating to the thread theme: for me, seeing 'neath the loincloth is what's key...
Edit: my slow connection meant the reply I started before Slick's response didn't post until after his did; not to be too argumentative, but I didn't recognize the picture in question as professional, and had often seen it without watermarks at non-pay sites; how are we to be sure, especially when some sites add watermarks to pictures they neither originate nor pay for, i.e. they repost exactly as many of us here do?
|
Does anyone know the story behind these photos, or what event they were taken at in the very least?
|