View Single Post
  #26  
Old 09-03-2012, 08:59 PM
Amurion Amurion is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3
Thanks: 3
Thanked 117 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crispus View Post
I can't say definitively, but I suspect the answer is that the duplicate of the removed picture simply hasn't been seen by a mod yet. What puzzles me, though, is why the first two iterations were unacceptable in the first place; in that vein I'd suggest that whenever possible (if the violation and/or violator aren't too egregious) a moderator removing part of a post leave some explanation, as the second excision in this thread did, namely "***** MAINSTREAM MOVIE CAPS REMOVED *****"

So as not to seem (or not exclusively!) pedantic, here are some pictures relating to the thread theme: for me, seeing 'neath the loincloth is what's key...


Edit: my slow connection meant the reply I started before Slick's response didn't post until after his did; not to be too argumentative, but I didn't recognize the picture in question as professional, and had often seen it without watermarks at non-pay sites; how are we to be sure, especially when some sites add watermarks to pictures they neither originate nor pay for, i.e. they repost exactly as many of us here do?

Does anyone know the story behind these photos, or what event they were taken at in the very least?
Attached Thumbnails
4749047787_e8244e2dd3_b.jpg   4749065725_2c7bf865b8_b.jpg  

4871324032_a48e3de052_b.jpg   4801917380_d28a6c2dd5_b.jpg  

Reply With Quote
The Following 26 Users Say Thank You to Amurion For This Useful Post: