Quote:
Originally Posted by snoep
Is it not fair to let swingers also have a place where they can do their thing ? Or rather more importantly, keep them in one spot so they don't infect the other more family orientated places ?.
|
I
did say that 'others will disagree', and the unwritten inference was that 'to each their own'. The problem I have with Agde is that it 'infects' the public's perception of naturism, by still being regarded as a naturist place, while swingers sort of dominate the public's perception of it, and by extension all of naturism.
There's also the inference that families are somehow subjected to a kind of curfew in order to avoid the swingers. Personally, I wish they, the swingers,
were run out of town, or else the proper naturists abandoned Agde to the swingers and went elsewhere. Elsewhere, incidentally, attempts to gain a swinging foothold in other naturist locations have spectacularly failed, so maybe we're at a point where naturism and swinging can be viewed as two distinct camps, and furthermore, seen as such by the general public.