There are a number of interesting things about these pictures depending on your interests. You'll see from the first frame that she looks a bit bewildered at what's happening on the street below her, like it's perhaps her first Mardi Gras. And you can also see that she's unaware of showing her panties as she certainly doesn't have that exhibitionist gleam in her eyes. She never even showed her tits so she wasn't there to show off. And she could stand to spend a bit more time trimming nose hair. Shooting from below I have more pictures of nose hair and boob job scars that I ever imagined I'd have.
The second interesting set of things has to do with camera focus and how a few inches of difference can mean the world when you're working with a longer lens. Look at the pic in bottom of the right column. You'll see that the camera is focused on the bottom edge of her skirt because that hard and contrasty line was more attractive to the camera than her low contrast panties, even though her panties were also within the area of the center focus point. And now look at the pic at the bottom and you'll see that the camera is focused directly on her panties, exactly what we want. If you look closely, you'll see that I dropped the center focus point about an inch, probably by accident, and the panties then became more attractive to the camera than the skirt. At 20 feet or so with a 200 mm lens (full frame so no multiplier) focusing a couple of inches in front of the target, like on the skirt, makes all the difference in the results. And that friends, is one of the main technical reasons why upskirts are so difficult. With the long lenses normally used, focus must be perfect in order to get quality results.
|