Quote:
Originally Posted by jim914109
I can usually tell a pro pic from an amateur pic pretty easily, and none of the ones I posted appeared pro to me. In the meantime, pro pics are all over OCC. Yes, I do report the most obvious and egregious ones, art nudes that have been filched from sites like DA, because I have too much respect for those photographers. I usually include a reference to who the photographer or model is when I report them. The ones that come from pay porn sites I let go by - there are so many, and who cares? If I were to report every pro pic I encountered here it would become a full-time job, and I would be doing the mods job.
|
I hate to tell you this, but you're doing it the wrong way around. "Art pics" from DA or MM or Flickr, etc., are the ones that are allowed. "Pro pics" from pay sites and adult magazines are the ones that should be reported and
need to be removed. They are the ones we
do care about. On occasion, art pics will get removed as pro pics if they look similar enough and there's no context for them, but on the whole, they are fine to stay. The only exception is if they're watermarked with a URL or copyright symbol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jim914109
In the meantime, I have some original stuff that I will not post here, because everything of value that I've found elsewhere and posted here has been reposted numerous times by the "volume posters."
|
If you're worried about this, you can always put a watermark on the (original) pics.
Fango