...I don't like....
the fact she's shaved/hairy/saggy/has a tattoo/had a really bad boob job done.
We've all got our own little preferences, right? I confess that I much prefer a woman in her natural form, not silicone enhanced, not shaved, not sporting an ugly tattoo on her shoulder/back/breasts.
I often see pretty faces, lovely bodies and so on, but there's an element of her that just knocks a mark or two off her being a '10'.
The attached pic is a case in point. A mature nudist with a pretty face ticks all the boxes for me, a mature nudist with a not so pretty face
but a nice covering of lady fur would make her perfect. As it is, there's something not quite right about her. Yep, it's her razor and wax.
I bet you all have your own preferences. You might be looking at this pic thinking she IS perfect as she is, and a bush would spoil her. So let us see your 9/10 photos, and explain the element of her that keeps you from scoring her a perfect '10' and why.
(If this thread grows legs, it could be exceptionally interesting to hear arguments rage back and forward regarding the attractiveness of silicone, ink or a razor).