![]() |
DOUBLE-SPREADERS with lots of 'eye-contact' with the camera, or pretty darn close!!
9 Attachment(s)
First, any number of multiple-spreaders is great, as long as it's clear they're posing for the camera -- meaning more than just one lovely lady is looking at the camera.
And by "pretty darn close" I mean a couple of double-spreaders in sunglasses is OK posing for the camera, as long as it's pretty clearly implied that they're looking at the camera. Likewise, if the shutter didn't fire exactly at the moment of maximum eye contact -- then there ought to be some sort of clear indication that the spreaders were JUST looking at the camera. In other words, I'm looking for pics (with 2 or more spreading ladies) WHERE THEY'RE HAVING A REAL MOMENT WITH THE CAMERAMAN, AND HE'S HAVING A MOMENT WITH THEM. They're not just posing for him dispassionately -- but they're looking right at the camera (and probably smiling, or giving some sort of facial expression) -- THAT'S ALL DIRECTED AT THE PERSON TAKING THE PICTURE. I'm sure the examples I upload will make this clear. Also, almost ANY kind of spreading counts. Anything that IMPLIES that the ladies are making some specific effort to let the cameraman (and camera) see things more clearly!! |
10 Attachment(s)
A few more!!
|
Double spreaders
10 Attachment(s)
One of my favourite genres.
|
10 Attachment(s)
few more...
|
10 Attachment(s)
and more!!
|
10 Attachment(s)
time for some more!
|
Tara and Lindsay double-spread together
5 Attachment(s)
Tara and Lindsay double-spreading together.
|
10 Attachment(s)
some more!!
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.