Stance on AI generated images
 

What is the mods' stance on AI generated images in this forum? Can they be posted if clearly labeled as such, in a separate thread of a relevant category, if not attempting to resemble a real person?

This something the moderators have been considering before we make an update in the Forum Rules.
I think the consensus is that AI generated material is similar to Photoshopped content that we consider fake.
Most of our members come here for real "Amateur" material.
The best solution may be to allow people share AI material as links in one of the Free Sites forum, rather than upload them here.

I love using A.I. generators.

I do use A.I. generators to upscale images of the wives of members and female members for the fake magazine covers. At the same time, it is quite irksome to be on Flickr and see A.I. generated mixed in with real content, imagefap also has this problem to a degree and one of the things I do love about real content is the fact that real content has a real human element behind it and that's part of this site's appeal.

Some other forums such as vipergirls and vintage erotica have created subforums for it and an accompanying rulebook, should we do that here?

Also, While I have not been able to do this yet. What is the stance on creating A.I.-generated art of the wives of members?

For example, I've thought about using A.I. to recreate dirtyharry11's wife, Jeanne from 1971 and get poses of her that she never took, would something like the be allowed?

I absolutely agree with admin in that a lot of the appeal is real women with real emotions etc. being pictured in the content here.

On the other hand, one of the really popular threads is called "General drawn ENF". I see the images I create as a version of that, but photorealistic and with AI assistance.

I'll await a rule amendment before I post anything. :)

I haven't tried many, but the one I use for everything, StarryAI, is pretty good and very easy to get into, unlike Stable Diffusion etc. You get a limited number of generations, which can be increased by "watching" ads.

Just removing clothes will often not give good results, as the image you input is not similar enough to StarryAI's training dataset. But if you allow it to also change other parts of the image to align closer to the type of images it's accustomed to, you may end up with a decent nude of your woman's very similar sister. I expect other softwares have the same caveat.

Should you begin experimentation, I would be interested in seeing both early and later KaCee as one of your subjects. Would love to see poses you might come up with.

Lets keep it real
 

I myself want to see Real women. There are many other sites that have AI photos where you can go see them. I don't see a problem in messaging someone here to photo shop their wife/girlfriend for there own private use. But let's keep the women we post here for public use real.

I'm still waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay off and still in the learning stage and I'm not sure if my technology is powerful enough but your wife along with Jeanne the main candidates that I'd like to recreate.

We have made a final decision not to allow AI generated material to be uploaded here.
The Forum Rules have been updated.
For people who want to share AI generated material, they can be posted off-site and links can be posted in one of the Links forums.