![]() |
Identify and make an ENF out of her?
3 Attachment(s)
I have three photographs, need everyone to see them to compare the faces to see if they are the same person.
Known1 is a photograph of this person from circa 2000. Known2 is a photograph of this person in 2006. Compare these against Mysterywoman.png. I tried looking at them side by side but I am inherently subjectively biased. Question is, is mysterywoman the same person as known1 and known2? Yes, mysterywoman has her legs spread wide open and she's not wearing anything downstairs! If I get more than 15 adequate responses I will post the full uncropped version of the photo. :) Of course, if you know any specific biographical details about the mystery woman it'd be more than welcome too. |
Yes
I would say that all three pictures is the same woman.
|
Structural differences in the eyebrows and nose lead me to believe they are two different women. Very similar in appearance, almost twin-like, but not the same person.
|
i'd say they're all the same if they're 6 years apart...she looks vey young in the first one, and could have matured into the second one.
|
nahhhh
the facial structure shows theyre all 3 different. even with possible age progression theyre different. id hardly even say that stand a chance of being sisters. first and third could be cousins perhaps but the 2nd one is another race then the other 2. all in all when theyre 18 send em my direction for a 4-way and in 9 months ill show you how related they are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! lol.
|
Appear to be three different women to me....
|
Middle definitely different than other two...other two may be the same
|
1,3 are the same gal
2 is different |
The OP said the first two are known to be the same woman. The question is whether the third is the some woman.
I think her expression and facial structure is very much like the first picture. Certain details like the way her hair falls make me think mysterywoman is the same woman sometime between 2000 and 2006. The only thing that looks wrong is mysterywoman's nose - it appears to be more concave whereas the woman in the other two pics has a more convex nose line. This might be the angle of that particular photo though - I'll say they are the same woman. |
1 Attachment(s)
Here's an image to help you compare. I haven't taken a good look yet, but from what I can see so far, I think all 3 women are the same person.
|
After a closer examination, I still maintain that all three images are of the same person.
|
I'll accept that picture three is the same person as person one with age progression and makeup. But take a look at the cheek bone structure in picture two. Nose is somewhat different.
With a good theatrical quality make-up kit, I could change the person in pictures one and two into the person in picture two. But if these were all casual pictures, not a covert op, or some other unusual effort at changing appearence, I'd say person two is a different person. Sorry, I no longer have access to a biometric or Bertillion-type photo analysis program. But I'd guess picture two is somebody else. |
angusniagara has good point...
about the nose that I hadn't noticed before.
In the second pic, the nose is different from the nose of picture one and three. The nose of the second pic girl has a little bit of a flat pushed up nose whereas the nose in picture one and three is rounded full-bodied nose there isn't a flat part to it at all on the tip. I hope this makes sense to most of you...if I can think of a better way to explain this, I will edit later. |
New photographs and metadata extracted
2 Attachment(s)
Hey all, good response so far. Some of you are paying a lot of attention to this!:)
In response to at least 2 claims that known1.jpeg and known2.jpeg are not the same person. I must acknowledge that after reviewing my sources, it is possible that 'known2' may indeed not be the same person as 'known1'. I have submitted two other photographs for examination, I do however insist the veracity of these are almost beyond reproach. Both are posed shots. known3 was almost certainly taken in the last 12 months. The image is thumbnail sized and there is no better resolution available. known4 is from around 2004, is most likely a scanned copy of a printed photograph. Both are most recent than 'known1' - so if you have to discount a photographs. I'd rather discount known1 in favor of these two new photographs. The age difference in subject between known1 and mysterywoman could lead to incorrect conclusion. Its not much to work with, but can you folks compare these against mysterywoman please. I also have another piece of information in the metadata of the mysterywoman file. The original photograph was taken using a 'Concord 2000' camera made by Concord corporation. Is this a make of camera found exclusively in one region of the world? Of course, cameras can be transported internationally too... |
New photo, new details and yet no replies.
I stand by my initial promise to post a photo of her with her box fully open, if I can get 15 unique responses. |
Looks the same to me
She is wearing makeup in the 2nd pic, and you can't see her ears, but the nose seems to look similar.
Because the lighting, camera quality and stuff is off, hard to be sure |
all are of same girl !!
|
Looks like the same girl to me.
|
I find it entirely plausible, given the change in lighting, that they could all three be the same person.
|
Definitely 3 different women.
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Here's the un-cropped version of the photo of mysterywoman, whomever she really is.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.