Miss Nude Naked City 1981
 

First post, please let me know if I am doing something wrong.

Attachment 1722350

Attachment 1722351

Attachment 1722352

No. You are not doing something wrong. That is unless not posting in my retro NAP thread is "doing something wrong".

on the contrary, you are doing something VERY right - so post them whereever you please....great start!

cheers,

Klondike

more 1981 Miss Nude contestants
 

to add to nudechurch's thread

do I have WHO'S 2009 photos? Who are we talking about? If you are talking about Erika Eleniak, she would have been 12 years old in 1981 and so she can't be the babe in the pictures above unless the year is wrong. thanks -

And Osreb - check the retro NAP thread because we don't want to be just hauling pics from that thread over into this one if we can help it.

KLondike

A few more
Attachment 1725351

Attachment 1725352

Attachment 1725353

Attachment 1725360

Attachment 1725365

The last of them from me.

Attachment 1730424

Attachment 1730425

Attachment 1730427

Attachment 1730428

Attachment 1730429

Wow. I second that motion from Klondike. The Retro NAP post is one of the best ever - and this one is a nice companion piece.

GREAT pics - thanks for posting them here.

Global Warming
 

Wow, maybe this Global Warming thing isn't the scam we thought it was.

Here we have photographic evidence that there are far less bushes now than there were 27 years ago.

NAP Pictures & doing wrong
 

You didn't do too much wrong other than take/steal/barrow from my other posts of my original photographs that I took at Naked City, IN & posted here & on another forum to share with others. You just took credit for all my work, that's all. Hope you enjoyed my photography. By the way they were shot with a Canon AE-1 & a 100-300 sigma lens using Kodak 100 ASA film.

sounds like someone has got some explaining to do........

forgive me for being a little confused -

Klondike

Here's what's great about these pix:

1-Natural Breasts
2-Bushes, for the most part nicely trimmed
3-Tan Lines

Remember Playboy in the 70s and Early 80s? Those centerfolds were far more sexy than the ones we get now.

Reply to mow
 

Thanks for letting me know. I haven't ever claimed credit for these photos as you state. All I could claim is that I found them on another site and shared them with these forum users. I thought this was the whole point of this forum. If you had perhaps pointed this out straight away this could have been dealt with at the time. However I will go with the collective view on this, if others agree with mow let me know and I will apologise.

DAMNED STRAIGHT!!

As I was looking at the photos, I was thinking that razors and implants are two of the great innovations of the last 30 years. But it is such a matter of preference.

Well, I would half way agree. And Gillette has certainly helped in that half with triple and 5 blade systems. (Good for men too, IMO) But as far as implants ? Seems like just ol' water balloons that we played with as kids, with a layer of skin over them. Not to mention the tell-tale round pie look and the scars. But again, that's just my opinion.