naked.wikia.com
 

i just discovered this site, and since it operates like wikipedia (or is a sub-unit of it), its worth checking into. Anyone can contribute info, and I noticed its coverage of naturist gatherings, runs and bikes is very good. Here is the link.

http://www.naked.wikia.com

I've only just begun browsing thru it, but already i found the naked pumpkin run pics i added to another thread, and these pics (censored) below from a link to the hamilton streaker club.

More awaits, and i'll add on as i find stuff -

klondike

I don't really know what relationship this site has to wikipedia. For example, the "streaking" entries are completely different. Wikipedia's entry is actually much better, but naked wikia has only been around since February, so it could grow. Anyway, I like the idea of naked.wikia - and may become a contributor.

Klondike

Nice! Boo on the blurs though.

there is no relation
 

Nice find Klondike. To answer your question, Wikipedia and this Naked Wiki wiki are not related at all. They were just built with the same wiki software.

Thanks again.

need new search terms?
 

One thing i found today under the "nudity" section was a few new search terms. Try these in Google:

"a poil" French
"en pelota" Spanish
"Adamskostuum", "spiernaakt", and "poedelnaakt" Dutch
"a la cordobana" Spanish

there are others....

Klondike

found using one of the search terms above.

Klondike

if there's no privates on display...what's the point?

uh...?
 

:confused: Is this a rhetorical question or are you asking someone in particular?

Use your imagination. Its a wonderful thing. Also, the point is there is this streaking club at hamilton and if i just tell you about it, you might not believe it. So I add pics so that you know I'm not just making it up.

Klondike

An imagination is good when I'm banging Denise Richards...for my elaborate filthy photo's that are right in front of me, I wanna see it all

Well, its much appreciated from me. Thanks.

wait, if you were banging Denise RIchards, instead of looking right in front of you, you'd be imagining something else? you are a strange dude!

anyway since we're all so lame and have no idea what is hot, why don't you post a few dozen examples of what you are talking about. :)

The simple answer to that is that im a lazy **** and can't be arssed. Doesn't mean I can't criticize

The PC answer is that...oh...every picture nearly has been posted before at some point...so what's the point.

No, that was merely an example of something I would imagine, rather than some women with their privates censored out.

That's a good point, Klondike.

For me, sometimes the situation and context of the photos is what is erotic rather than the sight of the private parts themselves. Sure, an unblurred photo would be preferable to a blurred photo of the same event, but for me, a blurred photo of the right situation is preferable to an unblurred photo of a model posing for a photographer for a magazine or something to that effect.

Naturally slagboy everyone now thinks you're a tosser and a shit disturber.

You're also a bit retro - troll was the term that was used - because it's been ages since I have been to any forum where someone signs up just to be a jerk.

If that's the PC answer - then you should take your bitter, miserable attitude and find a new hobby. Gardening might be nice. You can rail against the daisies all you want.

Keep up the good work Klondike, ignore the peanut gallery.

Cheers and Good Health

Hmmmmm. Did a search on "Slagboy". Can't find any posts.

Keep up the good work Klondike. Those of us who post very much appreciate it.

Oooh, an attack. Goody.

Tosser is another word for wanker....wanker means a serial masturbator. I can willingly admit to this, and so can the rest of you.

Shit disturber? Define please? Then I'll anaylse the insult and see if it befits me or not.

Unture, when there's something good to be said, I'll say it, and thats usually when I see some new pictures or vids that haven't been posted before. Rocketman's clothed/unclothed are usually outstanding. I don't like anything CFNM and I have said so, I also don't see any kind of titilation in pictures with censoring...and I've said so. Whether I post my own pics or not doesn't come into it. I don't post pics because I don't want to post pictures that have been seen a dozen times over and over and over...just as the group photos (2's, 3's, 4's etc) they are always the same and surely the duplication of them take up bandwidth. Every pic I see on a yahoo group or whatever has already been posted...and for your information, I have discovered some WNBR picture links that I shall be posting very soon.

Bitter? I can assure you matey, that the only bitterness spouting forth is over at Naked Pedia, who know that censoring the private parts will halve their custom due to purist perverts like myself not being interested .

Klondike and I understand eachother, he respects that I have an opinion.

Didn't search hard enough then did you. I've made loads of posts. If you mean posting pics, then no, it's not a requirement of this board, otherwise they wouldn't let people like me join. I've already explained my actions. But I have had the occaisonal pic or link.

For the record, "naked pedia" did not censor the pics, nor were they posted there. The pics were found on a different website through a link at "naked pedia".

I would also argue that lots of pics deserve posting even if they are censored if the subject matter is unique or noteworthy. I'd never bother to post a typical am pic if it is censored - not when you can find hundreds more uncensored ones just like it. But these pics are the only ones I know of that show this streaking club. There is a lot of useful info in a pic like that - how many streakers, how many are women, what the women look like, etc. All of this goes into my memory banks when I'm out and about shooting pics for y'all. And you can bet that if ever I cover the Hamilton streaking club, I will post my pics UNCENSORED :)

Klondike

...which denotes that you prefer them uncensored!!

Don't hate me for getting the title of the site wrong...

Of course :) I never said I didn't. But when you only have censored pics, what do you do...?

Klondike

Not bother.

Properly slightly otc, But its another wikopedia.

http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Main_Page

Personly, I hate censorship of any kind. But this is a picture forum, not a debate forum.

And a little research minus whining might result in this.

A nudist newscast. (http://www.clothesfree.com/videos.html)

Good call, but you're wrong about the whining