Yahoo groups screwed up
 

E_N_F_ is apparently missing - can anyone get to it?

There really hasn't been much activity lately. Maybe it just died. I think the owner of that group posts here, but I'm not certain.

E_N_F is no longedr listed in "My Groups". Several other similar groups, such as ReluctantSubjects, are also gone. Can some one suggest a direct email address to Yahoo where a lot of us can register our complaint? I suspect some one filed an abuse complaint against several of our favorite ENF type groups and Yahoo deleted them. I do note that many really "hard core" Yahoo groups are still in existance.
Thank goodness we have Alex and OneClickChicks to enjoy and also to communicate through.
erosbooks

You should probably find out the reason they are not there before you complain, they could have been shut down by the owner, they could have expired, it's not always Yahoo's fault.

yes, enf main group and reluctant subject have been shutdown by yahoo. try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ENFsharing001 or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/enf_bikini_top_sn*tcher tho niether very active.

Yep whole bunch gone again. Likely Yahoo again.

ENF recreated
 

The group was not deleted by Mutt and it was still active before the deletion.....two new ones have
been set up by Mutt + JK

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/enf_photos
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hmutts_enf

Thank lotfw. I lost like over 20. Arch groups still seem to be there tho.

Yahoo killed the groups
 

All those groups you mentioned (there were over 200 of them) were killed last week. ENF along with Reluctant Subjects were probably two of the more popular ones. Don't know about ENF but Reluctant has restarted at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Reluctant/

Yahoo gave no reason (and they don't have to)...they own the ballpark, the ball and all the referees.

enf groups back up
 

yeah, yahoo deleted my profile and all those great enf groups. i'm really not sure why. but it doesnt matter,
jk and i have created two new groups. i'm in the cleaning out my collection and plan on reposting all the greatest stuff i find in hmutts_enf. jks enf group will be a little less stringent on the posting since we all like to see naked most of all anyway.

come to think of it, we really need two lists because yahoo could delete one or the other, but i doubt they'll delete them both but you never know.

the links were posted in a previous post in this thread but here they are again.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ENF_Photos/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hmutts_enf

From what I hear Yahoo has a new policy on groups that post photos, first abuse report and the group goes. It is getting towards the point that Yahoo delete the group first and ask questions later..

Sucks I know but we can thank the DMCA for this, failure to respond to a DMCA take down order is a great way to lose your hosting.

I bet it is Alex worse nightmare material..

beginning of the end
 

The reason why these type groups are being terminated is because the high courts of the USA has said that photos taken of people without their knowledge is illegal and and that posting them on the web is a felony.So get ready guys..yahoo isn't the only one's that will be deleting those type sites & photos.I live in Ms and the local law made their 1st arrest this past weekend using that law.I haven't gotten the complete details of it but just from hear-say I gather that the person that took the picture could be facing a long jail time if the charge(s) stick.I never thought it would be illegal to take a photo of someone that is 1/2 dressed,after all doesn't that old saying go "take a picture,it will last longer"? I've also heard that malls and soforth will be posting signs that will state the fact that it is illegal to take such pics on their property.
I will let you guys know more as I find it out.As I'm a true voyuer myself and enjoy looking nip slip pics,and ect.,I think it sucks and will be looking for any loop hole to get around this new law.

Update?
 

Can I get a link to that case you mention? A link to the law? If this is for real, there could be bummer implications for sites like this one. Of course, I don't know where OCC is hosted from.

Actually, WeLookAtU2 is a bit off target. This is a recent development, and is statutorially-driven. Here are two quick examples: http://www.kypress.com/articles/may-2002/03.asp (Kentucky: "Two other bills, which the governor signed in April, relate to crimes: HB 130 and HB 133. HB 130 was sponsored by Rep. Jimmie Lee and it created a new crime of “video voyeurism.”); http://www.njsba.com/gov_relations/c...eaction=102703 (New Jersey: "This legislation creates a new criminal offense, video voyeurism. It is designed to help shut the electronic blinds on modern peeping toms. It will close a loophole in the state voyeurism law by penalizing those who rely on tiny cameras and other technological tools for sexual spying.")

However, one case from Washington State ruled against a voyeur statute: "In a ruling that could change fashions in Washington state, the supreme court there has ruled that "up-skirt cams" do not violate voyeurism laws.
The Washington Supreme Court judges said that two men who took surreptitious photos and video of women and girls using tiny cameras "engaged in disgusting and reprehensible behavior." However, the judges said they did not infringe on any reasonable expectations of privacy because the images were captured in public places.

"The voyeurism statute, as written, does not prohibit up-skirt photography in a public location," the judges wrote in an opinion issued earlier this month.

"The court said that while people could reasonably expect privacy in places such as a bedroom, bathroom or dressing room, they cannot while working at or visiting a public place such as a shopping mall.

"It is the physical location of the person that is ultimately at issue, not the part of the person's body," the judges wrote."