One Click Chicks Forum

One Click Chicks Forum (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/index.php)
-   ENF - Embarrassed Nude Females (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Savagely Dressed/Undressed (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?t=1368)

Jessica Savage 06-23-2004 10:36 AM

Savagely Dressed/Undressed 001
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hi,

001 should NOT be on the net. If they are, please feel free to post any others in the "series", if that's the case. If they are genuine and original, I will post more (including some, er... intimate views of the young lady.)

Because I do not know the One Click policy, I accept these may be deleted, as they are presumed (at this point) to be genuine photos of a woman who would NOT want 001 published. If this is the case, should I, in future (with photos of which there is no question they are original) block or mask faces, or not publish them at all at this site?

Thanks,

Jes

Bone 06-23-2004 05:52 PM

Whats 001?

Alex 06-23-2004 06:02 PM

Yep, I'm a bit confused myself.

Welcome to the forums Jessica Savage. I don't have any problems with this post. Not yet anyway. Feel free to post more.

Thanks

king_killa 06-23-2004 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex
Yep, I'm a bit confused myself.

Welcome to the forums Jessica Savage. I don't have any problems with this post. Not yet anyway. Feel free to post more.

Thanks

i think she means #1 (number 1) in a series of pics :confused:

Jessica Savage 06-23-2004 07:38 PM

Confusion...
 
Hi,

I'm new here, and it's my intention to post a series of pics not found on the newsgroups, etc. The basis of them is private, and pretty wrong. Let's simply put it that I'm going to show women dressed, then undressed, who would never want the pics to be shown. In fact, I shouldn't have them, but do. Most have to do with violating a trust made to them by a third party, and I got hold of them. I don't intend to block their faces in anyway, nor the more intimate details of their bodies. In fact, I intend to measure them up for the site. That is, I'm not only going to strip them, but give you the full details of their bodies as well. Every possilbe measurement, statistic and description.

Because I will number the posts, the first is 001.

If I'm at the right or wrong place, please tell me. If there's been an error on my part, please tell me. The first post MAY be posted at other places and I'm asking if anyone has seen them. Otherwise, anything I post in the future should not have that question.

Thanks,

Jes

Alex 06-23-2004 08:45 PM

Jessica Savage,

So far we don't have a problem with this.

I'm curious how this will unfold.

jizzman 06-24-2004 08:24 AM

Dressed and Undressed
 
1 Attachment(s)
Don't know who she is but she's very sexy

SocialCapital 06-24-2004 01:20 PM

Rock on
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jessica Savage
Hi,

In fact, I shouldn't have them, but do. Most have to do with violating a trust made to them by a third party, and I got hold of them.
Jes

Oooh! My favorite kind of porn! Post, Jes, post! And if you have bigger files, please don't scale them down for us!

jester976 06-24-2004 03:10 PM

In whereas the party of the first did with full intention post photographs of damn hot chicks, the party of the seconds commends you in the form of: nice post!!

miniaquifer 06-24-2004 08:00 PM

Post em!
 
Jessica!

Sounds like a great idea! Having the personal info makes it more...mmmm......."personal". ;)

Jessica Savage 06-24-2004 08:07 PM

Savagely Dressed/Undressed 002
 
8 Attachment(s)
Savagely Dressed/Undressed 002

I have made the decision not to identify the community where (at the time the photos were taken) the couple at issue reside.

A few comments (which I will probably omit in the future, as the photos speak for themselves) can be made about the woman’s breasts: They are a perfect D cup, medium hang (which will have seen better days by time she’s 40, though she was a the time the photos were taken, 23, and that was about a year ago) with a nearly 3” aureole. The aureole is blended with the flesh of the breast proper. Her nipples are not particularly perky, even when aroused. Notes about the subject include that she is highly sexual, and nearly trimmed nude. I have decided to omit the notes re: her pubis. The photo showing her tattoos has been lightened to detail their patterns. Her left breast has been enlarged (don’t say it) to examine her nipple’s structure and contour.

It appears the program at OneClick may have rearagned the order of the pics and I presented them. In any event, 002a will show you her with her boyfriend. They live together. 002b and its lightened version will show off her tatts, and the hang of her breasts. 002c is a wonderful, playful and sexual shot which one can appreciate her character. The face and eyes in this shot say more about her than all others. 002d is of course a full nude. 002e gives you a look at her jewelry and is perhaps too imtimate for this board. (The majority of the posts her objectify women to such a degree that we've become a slab of meat, and it almost doesn't matter we're nude, but the moderators will post to me that this type of a pic is not welcome here if they feel that is the case, as the imtimate moment should perhaps not be exploited. I will take direction from their comments.) 002f and 002g are the basis for making a determination of her breasts, and their aureole. There are other photographic tests I used to determine the harness of her nipples.

Hope everyone enjoys the pics.

Jes

popout4u 06-25-2004 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jessica Savage
Savagely Dressed/Undressed 002

I have made the decision not to identify the community where (at the time the photos were taken) the couple at issue reside.

A few comments (which I will probably omit in the future, as the photos speak for themselves) can be made about the woman’s breasts: They are a perfect D cup, medium hang (which will have seen better days by time she’s 40, though she was a the time the photos were taken, 23, and that was about a year ago) with a nearly 3” aureole. The aureole is blended with the flesh of the breast proper. Her nipples are not particularly perky, even when aroused. Notes about the subject include that she is highly sexual, and nearly trimmed nude. I have decided to omit the notes re: her pubis. The photo showing her tattoos has been lightened to detail their patterns. Her left breast has been enlarged (don’t say it) to examine her nipple’s structure and contour.

It appears the program at OneClick may have rearagned the order of the pics and I presented them. In any event, 002a will show you her with her boyfriend. They live together. 002b and its lightened version will show off her tatts, and the hang of her breasts. 002c is a wonderful, playful and sexual shot which one can appreciate her character. The face and eyes in this shot say more about her than all others. 002d is of course a full nude. 002e gives you a look at her jewelry and is perhaps too imtimate for this board. (The majority of the posts her objectify women to such a degree that we've become a slab of meat, and it almost doesn't matter we're nude, but the moderators will post to me that this type of a pic is not welcome here if they feel that is the case, as the imtimate moment should perhaps not be exploited. I will take direction from their comments.) 002f and 002g are the basis for making a determination of her breasts, and their aureole. There are other photographic tests I used to determine the harness of her nipples.

Hope everyone enjoys the pics.

Jes

Wow, and I thought I could be obsessive over the details of a woman's breasts. Heh.
Great post though, I look forward to more.

SocialCapital 06-25-2004 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jessica Savage
Savagely Dressed/Undressed 002

...Hope everyone enjoys the pics.

Jes

Yes, indeed! Thanks, and keep posting, Jes! Next time feel free to go into detail about the pubes, too. How did you get ahold of these photos? Keep on rockin!

Social Capital

jomime 10-14-2004 12:15 AM

thanx for this
 
please post all you have I would love to see more

dr dawg 10-14-2004 12:22 AM

thanks jes
 
more would for sure be welcum

OtterBeFun 10-14-2004 05:09 PM

Jess--intriguing and sexy post! Savage us some more...
;)

burger1701 10-14-2004 05:52 PM

post them
 
Sounds interesting - post away please.

miketru 10-15-2004 12:40 AM

Thank you jessica

Jessica Savage 11-21-2004 10:37 AM

Savagely Dressed/Undressed 03
 
4 Attachment(s)
Here's a woman in south-eastern California who would probably turn a few shades of crimson if the male members of her church choir got a load of these.

Jessica

fulljmoon 11-21-2004 10:44 AM

nice
 
great post jessica. please keep them coming.
thanks

RSQR_65 11-21-2004 10:49 AM

thanks for the great posts jessica please post more if you have them :D

claysun69 11-21-2004 05:22 PM

Right or Wrong?
 
Are these type of pics right or wrong??? Who Cares, i just know i like em' ALOT! Keep it up Ms. Savage.. :cool:

familywoman62 11-22-2004 12:33 PM

Need you as a Member
 
please join my yahoo group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dressedandnot/
you have the kind of pics we all want and share
;-)

fro2020 11-23-2004 08:33 PM

Keep bringing these. They are OUTSTANDING!

harry47 11-24-2004 04:57 AM

a decent post for a change


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Forum RulesTerms of UseTerms of ServiceDMCA18 U.S.C. § 2257RTA VerifiedPrivacy Policy