Kate Middleton topless!
 

Found these on the web...
This will be the future Queen of England.

If the technology that existed today was around 20 years ago....guaranteed we have been seeing topless pics of Princess Diana on a forum like this too. :p

A lot of rubbish about nothing, she is just a woman after all and they all look pretty much the same at that range. Press Leeches will do anything for money, that's why I do it for free!!!!;):cool::cool:

Big deal. The picture quality is so horrible they should'nt even of been printed. I guess French photographers have alot of free time.

Williams a lucky boy, I just wish the press (Gutter) would leave them alone.

The Photo's are Horrible because they were taken from a GREAT Distance with what is probably a Good Camera.

The 'press' don't usually use cheap cameras.

to be honest, these look like elaborate fakes. i think these are two very good but not quite perfect impersonators.

even allowing for the blurry distance lens, the first time i saw the pics i said "that's not Kate", face and hair all wrong.

it's also rather convenient that they seem to be in a perfect pose for the camera, even in a couple looking directly at the photographer.

nice lady, whoever it is, but i really don't think these are of the future Queen of England.

Actually, it seems to be true!
Follow the link: https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/show...postcount=9921

Mudbug

That's why we love you, Fisherman! : )

A royal source initially said the couple was "disappointed and saddened" and would consider legal action if the photos turned out to be genuine.

William looks a bit too short in the pictures. i stand to be corrected, but these look like rather well done fakes.

the only reason the British newspapers would turn these down - and they would have show edited versions to "expose a security breach" - was that they thought they were fake.

You could be Right! I Look at it this way: If that was you or I, getting photographed from a distance,loading up our cars with 'bags of cocaine' , the Photos's would NEVER Stand Up in a Court of Law in North America due to the Poor Quality.

aha! i knew something wasn't quite right, and i have clocked what it is.

google "Kate Middleton smile". in every picture, you will see her lip curls upwards at the right. in all of these pictures she is shown with her lip curling up to the left.

it could be that it is just her special "holiday smile", similar to how it seems her neck shrinks and chin gets wider. oh, and William drops a few inches in height on holiday too, it seems. could be the French water.

Poor Will - first his brother and now his wife exposed. Here's hoping that Grandma keeps her granny-panties on and away from the cameras! Lol

The editor of the French magazine that ran topless photos of Kate Middleton is suggesting she has SEX PHOTOS of the Royal couple in her possession but has decided not to run them ... yet.

Closer editor Laurence Pieau revealed the bombshell today while defending her decision to publish the topless pics of Kate ... saying "I won't hide the fact that there are more intimate pictures that exist that we haven't published and will not publish. These images are full of joy, not degrading."

She didn't specifically say sex pics ... but she didn't have to. It's pretty clear what she meant.

So why would she even tell the public about the unseen "intimate" photos?

She could be trying to paint herself as a heroic figure who SAVED the Royal fam from further humiliation ... or she just issued a thinly-veiled WARNING to Buckingham Palace: Back off the lawsuit, or else.

Given the divorce rate in that most dysfunctional of families, that might not turn out to be the case.

Agree that the pics could be any number of peoiple but as they are taking legal action and if you read through http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19604535 as well as numerous other news sites and there is no indication that the pics maybe fake I guess we can assume they're genuine

:D


Closer's editor said the couple were "visible from the street". a bit different from the earlier statement in which they were "taken from quite some distance with a telescopic lens". if these were taken from the street by a professional photographer then there's no reason at all for them to be this grainy, a look at the remainder of the threads on this voyeur section shows that.

fascinating if they are the real deal, but the quality, poses and curious distractions in the picture mean i am in no way convinced. it's a bit like that thing where people in Mexico or Bulgaria appear in newspapers when an image of the Virgin Mary appears on a piece of toast or in a tree - you see it because you've been told that's what you are looking at.

Pics such as these long distance grainy (yeah, I know that's not the proper term in the digital age, but you know what I mean) ones do very little for me. In fact, they probably hurt me as they make it less likely that my wife and other women will go topless on our next trip. She'll only get the point that topless = trouble, and I suspect many other women will feel the same way. It will reduce my voy opportunities for very little in return (except grainy long distance pics from a French magazine).

However, those of a certain age will no doubt recall the scandalous pics of Jackie O sunbathing nude on a Greek island which was probably owned by her then husband. Jackie O survived this scandal, and it happened back when it was really considered scandalous behavior.

I see a lawsuit has been filed. Stupid. It keeps the story alive and verifies that it is indeed her and not someone else.

They never listen to my advice for some reason.

Visible from the street though it doesn't say how far away the street is!!! :p I don't know enough about telephoto lenses to counter your arguement but I'm sure that if they were fake, The Palace would have said so by now.

Well
 

at least she knocked her sisters ass off the front page

it is claimed this is the Villa and this is the spot where the photographer "noticed" them.

Let us remember that there are degrees of fake when it comes to photos. We of all people know that. Was anything enhanced to make it more visible? Were the pictures digitally sharpened beyond their actual resolution? Those are apparently topless photos, but what do the raw images actually look like?

French privacy laws are very robust, and are considered much stricter than the US or other western European countries. Experts are agreeing that these photos appear to violate the law. The magazine took the risk publishing the photos banking on a boost in sales, and believing they could negotiate out of trouble with British royalty hoping to avoid further embarrassment. Claiming to have racier pictures is pure blackmail. I suspect they underestimated the British, but it wouldn't be the first time the French have done that, would it?

Great pics, even if bad quality.
Finally Kate on the spot instead of Pippa!
The pics the world has been waiting since the wedding!!!
The royal couple like to show themselves as common people ... doing what everybody do.
So, what's strange in being topless on vacation?

These are clearly genuine pictures, and it's good to see a topless Kate, there are far more nude pictures of male Royals than female ones! For example, pictures were taken of Williams a few years ago having a piss, where you see his dick clearly, and there have been full frontal nude photos of Prince Charles and Prince Andrew.

In the old days, when a magazine or newspaper had such pictures, everyone would have to buy the publication to see them, and they'd make a fortune. These days, surely most people wait for the pictures to be scanned and look at them on their computer, so the amount of money they'd make is far less. And this is before the potential for litigation and fines.

Frankly, as a Brit, I'm not surprised these scandalous shots got posted even if they're grainy, but rather shocked!
What would these photos prove? That Kate has breasts and pink nipples, like other British women? So cheap and disgusting. Everyone's got a right to privacy even if at times we love mocking our royals. :rolleyes:

Well I am a Brit (though I prefer English) and proud of it, and am very disappointed in these pics... I wish they were clearer. I was really looking forward to seeing those semi-royal tits.

If only the paparazzi cared to invest in military-grade cameras ;)
But I somewhat agree, see 'em and forget it. There are thousands of twins to check out elsewhere :D

kate's tits
 

The Royals have no right to privacy. What do they do for all the millions wasted on them. A genetic based dictatorship. Remember prince Chuck had his knob photographed through a window - too stupid to pull the curtains.

I hear they have more explicit shots of Kate that they are not releasing - pity she has great tits.

:rolleyes: They're real. End of. OK?

:D Quiet Chucky or you'll get your post deleted, as I did after I expressed similar opinions in the Prince Harry Naked Supporters thread.

:D Pix, or it never happened.

:rolleyes: I think many people here are confusing the words intimate and explicit.

They (Kate and William) sound surprised that someone take and publish these. Seriously. She should not have taken the chance of going topless outside, no matter how private the location may seem.

Looks like she could do with a good meal

IMO, just leave them alone. They make enough news with out even trying.

As a former member of the press, I can tell you if the palace KNEW these were fake they would not even acknowledge them, they wouldn't HAVE TO, so just by them reacting the way they have tells me they are 'real', but to what extent we don't know.

Definitely real!!!
Otherwise, no leagl action from Buck Palace
Unfortunately bad quality, but nice enough ...
We now are waiting fro the pussy too!

I have just seen parts 1 & 2 of the Se Og Hor pics(thanks to Trog) and there is good news and bad news.The good news is there are a couple of pics where kate is completely bottomless having removed her bikini bottoms whilst changing and she is facing the camera full frontal,the bad news is the pics are so fuzzy it is really hard to make anything out at all.The one hope we have is that there might still be a further few full frontal shots out there that are much clearer :-)

There are a couple of nice ass shots though where most of her bare ass is exposed whilst william slaps the suntan lotion on lol

Where can I find these pictures?

Well after extensive zooming in on the best full frontal pic where she has pulled her bikini bottoms down to her kness at that point i would say that kates carpet certainly matches her curtains :-) although as i said don't expect too much as pics very grainy and even though on zooming in you can make out she has a darkish bush it is not very clear.I just hope there are some other pics out there which are clearer(i think at the point where she was removing her bottoms i suspect the photographer was only taking photos with one hand lol)

Here are latest kate middleton pics :-), big thanks to Troglodyte who published them originally.

Here are a few more from same source :-)

you know it was only a matter of time before they got some pics of her like this.

On a good note however, since she is admired by many females, she is giving a good example to others that it's okay to go nude outside. Make it a trend.