Lunch Time Park Uppies
 

Spotted a cutie in the park
Set 1

SET 2

SET 3

SET 4

SET 5

SET 6

Or just see aquavite's posts of the same pics from a few weeks back.

Agreed, yet another post destined for the archives hopfully never to be seen again.

"Lunch Time Park Uppies - Spotted a cutie in the park - Set 1"


This is pretty clearly claiming credit for Aqua's work. Note that he does NOT say, "hey, I just wanted to re-post this great set from Aqua".

"Spotted a cutie in the park" is generally accepted to be a slightly shorter version of "I Spotted a cutie in the park". "I" means that he (the poster) spotted her, and the insinuation is that he then took the pictures. Otherwise how would the pictures exist? It's a little surprising he didn't write a story to go along with his fake photo shoot. In absolutely no version of English does "Spotted a cutie in the park" translate to "Aqua spotted a cutie in the park, and these are the great photos he took".

This type of behavior should be an InstaBan. Anything else simply signals that it is just fine to claim credit for the work of the handful of original shooters that still exist on this forum.

While i understand your grandstand, reality is this pic set has been on at least four other sites in the last two months including multiple threads on Reddit. If the criteria is any comment when posting a pic or vid must be the gospel truth there would be virtually zero on this site. Everyone says this is my gf/wife/sister in law/neighbor etc. it builds up interest in the majority of viewers who have no real clue how the internet porn world works. This particular set has also been on two pay sights similar to this, hope the "original"poster is getting paid LOL