![]() |
Quote:
|
6 Attachment(s)
before and after
|
Quote:
Regarding the future, I honestly don’t know why people keep going on about ‘dwindling female participation’. It’s struck me as a given that less women take part in these things because women take less risks, are more sensible, and less likely to do things like this as a bit of fun, unlike lads. I’m sure back in 2005 when flip phones and Nikon cameras were the mainstay there were more women taking part, but at London alone this year we must have seen 100 attractive young ladies from ages 18-35 totally nude, with probably 150-200 more in their underwear. Let’s not forget that this is completely unheard of! In the 1950s this would have brought the sky down! The way I see it, society is going to go one of two ways: either we end up in some kind of prudish puritan religious state or we end up with total societal freedom. Exhibitionist girls and women are more empowered than ever before in our society with things like o***fans and Instagram. They know that firing someone for getting naked in public in a non-sexual event is not s good look these days. I myself know of at least one girl from my sixth form (only 40 students in the year) who used to be very prudish but went to Australia and now posts pictures of her nearly naked bum in tiny thong swimsuits. Do the math - that’s a lot of exhibitionist females who want to show off! In conclusion, if these events start dwindling it will be because of rules and legislation, not a lack of motivation or a fear of being found out. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
- Yes, women are more "sensible" perhaps because they have more to lose and are more vulnerable both physically and socially eg to hypocritical social oppobrium. Quote:
- Sadly not enough of society is as enlightened as you are. Quote:
- I've seen queries like why has such and such a beautiful woman (eg Barclays librarian, eg flower girls) stopped doing WNBR? - I've heard of some (perhaps naieve) women complaining about being objectified by their cropped pictures at WNBR and also of intrusive photographers. As to "rules and legislation" - I don't which ones you mean, WNBR is lawful in eg UK. The Conservative government plans to limit all protest - not specifically nude ones. |
Quote:
However, as a compromise I would suggest at least leaving a gap of at least a year before doing a dressed/undressed comparison using social media. |
Quote:
Yes I saw that article from a while back with a woman complaining about the photographers. I think that there isn’t much wrong with the sorts of stuff being posted on Flickr (either photographers fully taking part in the event themselves or doing non-intrusive shots from the far to side of the road). Ultimately in a society where we have to legally wear clothes, someone being granted permission by the authorities to get naked and (presumably) enjoy all the various enjoyable ‘states of mind’ that one might experience while should not be able to demand freedom from the consequences of their exhibitionism. I also have to say that she is very much in the minority, with most people giving the photographers a friendly wave or perhaps a shy smile. About protests being banned, I very much doubt something that fully complies with the current government agenda of both the Conservatives (net zero) and the London Labour Party (Mayor Sadiq Khan’s ultra low emission zone) is going to be first on the chopping block. |
Hey guys...
You all make great points, with well thought out insights and opinions. I like the pictures better. :D
|
Dressed undressed at WNBR with friends and boyfriend
10 Attachment(s)
Dressed undressed at WNBR with friends and boyfriend
|
Quote:
I hope you choose to contribute.:) |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.