So, I'm confused.
 

If one girl's pubic hair is obscuring another girl's vagina in a photograph, is that considered hidden?

What if, during a brisk act of photographed cunnilingus, one girl's vagina is obscured by her own pubic hair - but only because it was caught in the teeth of the other girl?

This could be what the polka industry needs to attract a younger crowd...

Now that we have RULES
 

Lats post some pics

Now that we have rules, we can test them......? :)

I can tell you this much, the "prefered" (sounds a little snooty here) hidden nudity pic has the objects at some measurable distance from the body parts being covered.

But maybe this is just a "hidden" vs "covered" distiction though, and this thread is actually for both. So in otherwords, although most of the pics you just posted are covered, not hidden, they are still OK to go here.

....except for the naked cowgirl pic, IMHO, which is a pasties pic and pasties are "worn" (meaning she does not have to physically hold them in place with her hands). And also the pie plate pic, which is an improvised clothes pic.

The tie pic I would say is covered because even though she is not holding it in place with her hands, she would have to eventually if she started to move around. Also, the other boob is hair covered and thats OK. IMHO again, if she were to use some tape to hold the tie in that position, it would then be an improvised clothes pic (except for the hair...)


Finally, we have the suds pic? mmmm.........lets see, where did I put my rule book....?

Klondike

Winner winner CHICKEN DINNER!!
 

THESE ARE AWESOME!!! That third girl is adorable....any more like these??

To continue with my lecture ( I was trying to edit my last post but didn't get it done in time).

First, covered and "clothed" have distinct meanings here. Clothed referes to covered situations where the covering stays in place without the aid of hands, and remains so regardless of what position the body is in (lying on stomach vs lying on back, for example). Therefore, the pasties and the pie plate taped to the body are clothed pics, not covered pics.

OK, go ahead and laugh (I'm sure you are by now).

OK, McSky - hidden and covered nudity pics require some premeditated action and thought. The hiding and covering are generally deliberate, not accidental. If someone's hair gets in the way of another's boobies by accident, in otherwords, that is "obscured" nudity, not hidden or covered nudity. One must prove intent on the part of the person covered or hidden for a pic to be considered as such. Sometimes, a babes own hair might accidently obscure her privates, in which case we do not have "intent" to cover and so we have no covered pic IMHO.

It just sounds like I'm taking all this ultra seriously. Really, I don't care for lawyers much and so consider this to be more like parody.

Klondike

1 more question for the rules committee
 

what about cats?

Ah hah! We have an unusual situation here. Is the intent to cover, or cuddle? I might have said cuddle, but one look at the girls expression (and how she is holding the cat) and you know she is playing sexy games with the camera, here. So I say the intent is to cover and make it APPEAR as though she is cuddling. Or to do both at the same time. The decision - this is a covered/hidden nudity pic. Nice one, Osreb...

Compare that pic to the one below. Below the intent is to cuddle, not cover, IMHO. So this one does NOT qualify.

Klondike

OBVIOUSLY it's not hidden nudity if you can see the pussy...

Both of those sound like physical impossibilities...or else my imagination just isn't strong enough. :confused:

Fango

Fango weighs in:

It occurs to me that I've never really given a concise and consistent definition of what Hidden Nudity is, or should be, besides "nudity hidden by strategically placed objects", so I'll try to be a little more specific here: Anything and everything that happened in the Austin Powers scene is what I consider to be Hidden Nudity. I consider that scene to be the Rosetta Stone, if you will, of Hidden Nudity, because it was one of the first things I saw that helped me formulate the concept of Hidden Nudity, and is one of the most perfect examples of it I've seen (The "Nude Practice" sketches with Sarah Alexander would be up there too, if I could ever see a whole damn one. :( :rolleyes: ). In that scene, you had physical objects (the key ingredient) being held by the woman in front of herself (both directly touching her body and a short distance away); someone else holding objects in front of the woman; and objects that weren't held by anyone, but were strategically placed in the foreground, or in front of the woman (my favorite type). Those three sub-categories make up what I call Hidden Nudity, regardless of intent, etc. Anything else (pasties, improvised clothes, etc.) is something else ("covered nudity", "clothed", or whatever you want to call it). I consider both of the cat pictures to be Hidden Nudity, though the one that's "intentional" is certainly "better", as far as Hidden Nudity qualifications go. Hair squeeks into the HN category, even though it's not an "object" per se, because it is not worn or placed directly on the body (it merely "hovers" in front of it, sort of). Basically, if it is something directly against the body that is NOT held, it is NOT Hidden Nudity. That's the way I see it. :cool:

Fango

Thanks for that -

regarding intent - that is sort of a grey area, maybe. I mean, perhaps the most common example of lack of intent is in a group photo, where a woman may be standing behind another individual who is partially hiding their nakedness. Certainly there is no intent to hide, and I don't think either of us would consider that hidden nudity. Certainly I have never posted any of those pics here, and there are tons of them. In general, any pic containing two or more people where one is partially hiding another without intent to hide - neither you nor I have ever posted any pics like that and called them "hidden nudity".

see my example - not hidden nudity, IMHO

On the otherhand, I've seen scenes from videos you've posted where objects suddenly appear out of nowhere to cleverly keep a moving nude hidden. But even here, there is still intent - on the part of the producer! I mean, its meant to LOOK accidental to the audience, but there is still intent SOMEWHERE. Thats filmaking for you....

Klondike

that pic I posted is a bad example, because two of the babes are sort of covering themselves. And you can still see a little ass crack on the babes that are mostly hidden.

Oh well, you get the idea...

Klondike

hidden nudity with a cock
 

if she held it lower I could saw the cock covered the cat.

Wow!

Thats one lucky cock!

Klondike

Indeed...
 

You could even say that it ran its comb through her hair.

The term "chickenhead" probably also works when it's a girl.

sorry Klondike
 

I know these are against the rules.

But just couldn't stop myself from posting.

sort of like a compulsive tendency now? You can't stop? Maybe there is a twelve step program.....

But you are so close to that 10,000 thank milestone, osreb - the first to get there?

pity....

Klondike

because it makes it a bad example of HIDDEN nudity if the crack is visible!

Klondike

How bout these?
 

I think they all of teh hidden nudity rules criteria.

don't think i've seen this one here

some hidden shots

more guitar
 

covering

anything but clothes
 

covering

Hey Klondike ...
 

opimion on using body parts to cover the privates.

or suplimenting the object with body parts.

Here is some examples.

1, 2, 3, 5 and 8 are Hidden Nudity pics, because they all involve objects held by, or placed in front of, a woman to hide (at least part of) her nudity. I suppose if you wanted to quibble you could say they're "half-Hidden Nudity pics" or something like that, but to me, as long as any part of the body is hidden by an object in one of the 3 basic Hidden Nudity ways, it's a Hidden Nudity pic.

4, 6, and 7 are all just good old-fashioned cover-up pics, although 7 is a good one with the knees.

Thanks

Fango

What Fango said, but the second to the last pic gets back to the "intent" issue again where I split hairs. If there is no intent to hide, then perhaps it is neither a "covered" nor a "hidden" pic but something else.

Found a good one the other day -

Klondike

Cats. hair and flowers
 

covered pics

Now a few teddybears weekly/covered hidden. :)

game systems - 1
 

hope these aren't reposts, recently came across a whole bunch of hidden nudity pics i had never seen before. this is batch one of two for the hidden nudity with gaming consoles, have a fair bit of her to post if people are interested:)

gaming systems - 2
 

and here's the rest. :)

more stuffed animals
 

cover ups

If i could.... i would like to play my own game with the girl and have my own console for te game.
:D:D:D

anyone hungry
 

covered nudity with food

Flowers and Foliage
 

covered nudity

pillow talk
 

huggin a pillow

"B" theme
 

belts, bows, books

few more Bs
 

Bottle, boxing gloves, bouquets, Billard Balls

Friday night
 

cover ups

mid week
 

cover ups

excellent two sets, osreb. Thanks!

klondike