Fango

Lighten Up!
 

[QUOTE=Fango;533646]Fango[/QUOTE

Cripes, you deleted my post in under 5 minutes. You really need to get out more!

I know people don't want to see bullshit fake posts 'shopped to CLAIM to be something they're not. But this was all in fun and totally in keeping with the theme of the post. Some of you mods take your jobs way too seriously!

I have been coming to this site and contributing for YEARS and resent this ridiculous, heavy-handed censoring.

Because of the USERS, this is one of my favorite sites. But every so once in a while, somebody with a modicum of power has to go and dick it up with sophomoric "letter of the law" enforcement of irrelevant rules.

Bottom line, you have the power. But don't expect not to be called on it when you ABUSE it!

DD

Right. I've "been coming to this site and contributing for YEARS" as well, and have noticed that you seem to be very quick to anger. All I can say is, pick your battles wisely. Do you really want to waste a good row with a moderator over a silly joke photoshopped picture? :)

And, I do the best job that I can, and that means enforcing the rules. That rule doesn't say "DO NOT post or request photoshop / edited fake photos, except for joke pictures". I don't consider enforcing a rule as written to be abusing my power, but you are entitled to your own opinion, of course. :cool:

Fango

------------

First of all, I don't anger "easily" .... but when it's justified, I'll call something what it is. Saying I "anger easily" because out of the countless posts I've made and hundreds of THANKS and praises and respect I've given for the fine work of so many here that less than 1% of what I have ever posted here has been "angry" is at the very least an overstatement and an obvious intentional dig. Just because I'm not so fixated on spankin' it or trying to garner clout with the self-appointed "in crowd" here that I won't take pause at arrogance is hardly justification to label me "easily angered". You, however, have angered me.

I thought my pic was pretty cool and worth sharing as an interesting (and very topic-relevant) "what if" more than a "joke picture" as you call it. And it's better work than the vast majority of hacks can manage in Photoshop. That having been said, I understand that no one wants to see any of these fine threads degrade into altered pics as any kind of regular thing. This is where you chose "letter of the law" over SPIRIT of the law.

All over this site, there are "violations" of the rules. There are watermarked pics, HC in the Softcore section, pics of girls that every decent pervert knows as a pro being posted as amateurs. But you know what, I really don't mind those minor violations of the letter of the law because if they started any kind of undesirable trend, I know you mods would (and do) axe it. I just think that picking on me is a bit petty, considering.

So when you make veiled threats like, "pick your battles wisely". To you, I say, I do indeed.

DD

Blowing up over having one rule-breaking picture removed is how I arrived at the conclusion that you are easily angered. This follows from the pattern I've seen in the past: When someone does or says something that you don't like, you launch into ranting and name-calling, rather than trying to defuse the situation. Rants accomplish little in the long run, except to get others to rant back at you, and to draw attention to yourself. To be fair, you're right, it doesn't happen often, but it happens often enough.

And I'm really not sure where you're getting "arrogance" from. :confused:

To my knowledge, Alex has never given the mods a list of situations when it is OK to let users bend the rules a little. Who knows, maybe he will someday, but until that time, a fake pic is a fake pic is a fake pic, no matter the intent.

Whenever someone gets angry over a pic or post of theirs being removed, some variation of this statement seems to crop up, to which I always reply: You are welcome to report any post that you find that contains material that breaks the rules. The mods will remove it.

Removing your picture was not a personal attack. Please don't try to make it out to be one.

Not a threat, merely a humble suggestion. Though I still think it's a bit silly to be arguing over a joke/"what if" picture. :rolleyes:

Anyway, if you'd like to continue to chew me out, you're welcome to, but can we please do it through Private Messages? I'd prefer that threads don't devolve into arguing. Thanks.

Fango

https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...5&d=1235993272 This is the family that appeared on the old Howard Stern show broadcast on the ET Network.

The mother didn't come but another sister of theirs did. They claim to be a real ******ual family and Howard did confirm that they really are indeed sisters and seen their material on their website and confirmed that they're telling the truth. He further went on to say that if your looking for the real deal to check them out. On the rebroadcast of this show, the site was bleeped out. Wish I could've seen it before it was shut down.

Anyway, if you'd like to continue to chew me out, you're welcome to, but can we please do it through Private Messages? I'd prefer that threads don't devolve into arguing. Thanks.

Fango[/QUOTE]

--

You are right. I don't agree with your decision, but I need to reserve my "rant energy" for people that have done worse things.

DD

found some more
 

don't think they are repost

2 sis & mum
 

...from a german network community.....

Attachment 1555812

Attachment 1555813

Attachment 1555814

Russians
 

another could be....Mom and 2 daughters?

Whatta ya'll think?