Smoke-Out pictures, July 27, 2002, part 3
 

At the time, the East Smoke-Out was held in Salisbury, NC. It was the 3rd annual event.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 20, 2003, part 1
 

These pictures were taken on Friday, June 20, 2003, as bikes started rolling in from the run from the West event. Here's a few NN's first.

keep em coming charlie, thanks:D

Smoke-Out pictures, June 20, 2003, part 2
 

These pictures were taken on Friday, June 20, 2003, as bikes started rolling in from the run from the West event.

love biker women there all mature and love the weigh the booobs hang

Smoke-Out pictures, June 20, 2003, part 3
 

These 3 girls were at the Smoke-Out with the fellows from 'Redneck Engineering'. The people from 'Redneck' think Jesse James(West Coast Choppers) is a joke. These pictures were taken on Friday, June 20, 2003, as bikes started rolling in from the run from the West event.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 20, 2003, part 4
 

These pictures were taken on Friday, June 20, 2003, as bikes started rolling in from the run from the West event.

love small titted milfs

I LOVE this girl .... wooooooo

https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...1&d=1320274995

Smoke-Out pictures, June 20, 2003, part 5
 

These pictures were taken on Friday, June 20, 2003, as bikes started rolling in from the run from the West event.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 20, 2003, part 6
 

These pictures were taken on Friday, June 20, 2003, as bikes started rolling in from the run from the West event.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 20, 2003, part 7
 

These pictures were taken on Friday, June 20, 2003, as bikes started rolling in from the run from the West event.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 20, 2003, part 8
 

This is the last of the pictures taken on Friday, June 20, 2003, as bikes started rolling in from the run from the West event. The next group will be from Saturday.

huge breasted biker babe Matilda

Smoke-Out pictures, June 21, 2003, part 1
 

Taken on Saturday, June 21, 2003, the second day of the event, a few NN's to start.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 21, 2003, part 2
 

Taken on Saturday, June 21, 2003, the second day of the event. I really liked the butt on the blonde in the daisy dukes.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 21, 2003, part 3
 

Taken on Saturday, June 21, 2003, the second day of the event.

Biker babe :D

Smoke-Out pictures, June 21, 2003, part 4
 

Taken on Saturday, June 21, 2003, the second day of the event.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 25, 2004, part 1
 

Taken at the Smoke-Out V, June 25th, 2004.

a few
 

I like the regular ladys best. but I found her sexy

love biker thongs...seems to be mature women

Smoke-Out pictures, June 25, 2004, part 2
 

Taken at the Smoke-Out V, June 25th, 2004.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 25, 2004, part 3
 

Taken at the Smoke-Out V, June 25th, 2004.

chuckklr98 - please read
 

chuckklr98, in an earlier post I came down on 'collect' rather hard for a post he made in the 'Biker Rallie's' thread. It didn't bother me that he shared or posted my pics. That's actually a compliment. What bothered me was that it contained photos from the 'Can she ride it - the mechanical bull' and 'Biker Rallie's' threads in the immediate preceeding post in the same thread 12 hours earlier. I've since been in contact with 'collect' via several messages. He's a good guy. He simply was trying to contribute and didn't realize where the material came from. He has conveyed to me that he got the stuff from your 'Flickr' account. Again, I don't have a problem with people reposting or sharing my stuff. I'm not stupid, I know my pictures will possibly be posted elsewhere. That's fine, as long as it's not a pay site. I'd hate for someone to make money off something they can get for free.

The problem is that the way you're handling it(not just you, others also) is creating a lot of duplicates on this site. As I've said earlier, I've got tens of thousands of original pics on various subjects. When I first came to this site I was looking for places to share my pics. As I checked out threads I kept coming across duplicates within the same thread. You, and others, are causing this. Many people here have 'Flickr'(and other) contacts. They find pics on 'Flickr' and post them here. To the credit of some, they will post a message to the effect "Found these on 'Flickr'".

I'm asking that you do the same thing on your 'Flickr' account. All you'd have to do is add a note to your post, "Found these on the 'One Click Chicks'" site. If you add that note people would know not to repost them here. I want this site to prosper. I have nothing against your site and wish it well. All I'm asking is a little cooperation.

Before I started posting here I contacted Alex, the owner, and asked if it would be okay to add the tag 'Photo/Scan by Fast Charlie' to my pics and he gave his approval. As a result I started tagging my pics and have a bunch ready. If you add the note to a group of pics you get from here it will remedy the situation. Otherwise, I'm going to have to start tagging my pics with 'Photos by Fast Charlie posted on OneClickChicks.com'.

If you're just coming here and grabbing pics you probably won't read this. But I hope you read it and will agree to cooperate. If I knew the name you were going under on this site I would have sent you a PM. Thanks.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 25, 2004, part 4
 

Taken at the Smoke-Out V, June 25th, 2004.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 25, 2004, part 5
 

Taken at the Smoke-Out V, June 25th, 2004.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 25, 2004, part 6
 

Taken at the Smoke-Out V, June 25th, 2004.

great additions charlie, thanks:D

Smoke-Out pictures, June 25, 2004, part 7
 

Taken at the Smoke-Out V, June 25th, 2004.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 25, 2004, part 8
 

Taken at the Smoke-Out V, June 25th, 2004.

Another awesome post. Thanks Charlie. Keep 'em coming

Bike Week 2002, Part 1
 

These were taken May 17th, 2002, at Myrtle Beach, SC, the second Saturday of Harley Bike Week. I also stay over for Black Bike Week which follows. I'll probably post some of them also at some point. Harley Week is usually about the tits, Black Bike Week is all about the butts. BTW, the tall blonde, probably 6'2", in the last five pictures is a former Penthouse Pet of the Month and was the current Miss Easyriders. She was there representing Blue Nun Choppers and hawking her wares on vendor row. I asked her about flashing for us and she started off about how she was a former Pet and such(that's in the first photo of her), sort of arrogant, as if it was beneath her dignity to flash. A biker in the crowd spoke up, "That's okay, he's already got a picture of my ol' lady with natural perky ones. He needs a picture of fake hanging ones for comparison." Her 'escort'(you can see him in one picture carrying a Penthouse bag) got all jacked up over that comment. I turned and walked away, afraid I was going to burst out laughing. She saw me later and called me to the side of the hauler, and, as if she was doing me a great big favor, she turned toward the hauler so nobody else could see and gave me a shot of her tits. It's strange what a few minutes of fame can do to people. As you'll notice in the pictures, she had a rather flat butt and stretch marks on her saddlebags. The airbrush people did wonders in the wares she was hawking.

Smoke-Out pictures, June 25, 2004, part 9
 

Taken at the Smoke-Out V, June 25th, 2004.

Bike Week 2002, Part 2
 

These were taken May 17th, 2002, at what was then called 'HD Spokes'. There has always been biker bars at Myrtle Beach. But they have always been rather small and, unless you were a hardcore biker, a lot of people were literally afraid to go near them. In the 90's, South of 'Myrtle Beach', something of a 'mega' biker bar was opened. It was called "Suck, Bang, Blow". It had a burn out pit, a large bar, smaller cabanas, and large patio on top. During Bike Week vendors came and set up on the grounds and nearby. People poured in. Years ago 'The Strand' consisted of 'Cherry Grove', 'Ocean Drive', 'Crescent', 'Atlantic', 'Myrtle', 'Surfside', and other beaches. But as 'The Strand' grew in population the beaches began to merge and no one really knew where one beach ended and another began. The beaches are now called 'Myrtle', 'North Myrtle', and 'South Myrtle'. Only 'Atlantic Beach', a privately owned beach about 3 blocks wide, remains isolated and breaks up 'The Strand', over 30 miles of public beach, with 'Myrtle' being in the middle..

Anyway, the original "Suck, Bang, Blow" drew huge crowds but created traffic problems. Plus, a lot of people didn't want to drive to almost the Southern most point of the strand to party and then take a chance driving the distance back to their lodging. Around 2000 a "Suck, Bang, Blow II" was opened at 'Myrtle Beach' on the Hwy#17 By-Pass. This still didn't take care of the crowd 17 miles North. People saw the opportunity and opened "HD Spokes" outside the old 'Cherry Grove' beach, the Northern most point of the strand, on Hwy#9 toward Loris. It's huge, inside and out. It has 7 cabanas outside that serves drinks and a huge burn-out pit, probably 80'x40', and an exit ramp probably 75 yards long from the burn-out pit to the road. There's signs that say 'No Burn-outs' and 'Exit ramp 5 mph'. But of course everyone knows that's for legal purposes. The wet t-shirt contest is held in the burn-out pit. You'll be able to see some of the tire marks in the later pictures.

Everyone knew what the 'HD' in "HD Spokes" stood for. Harley Davidson threatened to sue them so they had to change their name after the first year. But it was called "HD Spokes" when these pictures were taken in 2002.

Bike Week 2002, Part 3
 

Some more from "HD Spokes", May 17th, 2002.

Bike Week 2002, Part 4
 

Some more from "HD Spokes", May 17th, 2002. The wet t-shirt contest was about to begin. The contest was held in the burn-out pit.

Bike Week 2002, Part 5
 

From "HD Spokes", May 17th, 2002. More of the wet t-shirt contest. The contest was held in the burn-out pit.

Folks, I gotta admit it, I blew it. I'm usually privileged enough to have good access to most biker events in the Southeast. I get access backstage and such prior to and after events. That's usually real important because it allows me to 'set-up' for shots. I know what the field of girls looks like. One of the worst things that can happen is to run out of film at the wrong time. In the early 90's I carried 2 film SLR's and would load fresh 36 exposure rolls before things like a wet T-shirt event. In the mid 90's I started carrying 1 SLR and a digital(my first was a Sony Mavica 90 that recorded on floppy disc, boy, was that a piece of crap). By this time, 2002, I was carrying a film SLR and an Olympus E-10 digital SLR. The Olympus E-10 was a good camera but the buffer would only handle 4 pics while it was writing. And Olympus didn't make an external battery pack so it would sometimes take a few seconds for the battery to recover for the next flash.

Anyway, I had scanned the field of girls prior to the event and identified my primary points of interest. In hindsight I really blew it. For some reason I failed to recognize how pretty the brunette on the right in the first picture is. I think we, as men, pay too much attention to youth and blondes. I know I do. I got plenty of pictures of the 2 blondes. But I don't have any of the brunette as the primary point of interest. I'm sorry because, IMHO she's just flat out daggum pretty. I think you'll agree. She's not as young as the blondes but there'd not be any disgrace in taking her anywhere.

love all thses thongs and older women flashing amazing

Toronaga, I don't consider you "...an ass..." for your input. I respect and digest all post, replies, input, and concerns, and appreciate your 2¢. To address your concerns, I've acknowledged several times on this site that these are my pics. Even in the post that you replied to I said "... my stuff." and "...I've got tens of thousands of original pics on various subjects.", and "...my pics.", and "...I started tagging my pics ...", and "...tagging my pics with...", and "...posted on OneClickChicks.com...".

While your concerns are legit, so are mine, even more so. The "/" in "Photo/Scan", while it may be considered broad by some, is legally interpreted to mean 'and' or 'or', or 'both'. In the case of my 'film' photos, they are my photos 'and' I scanned them. In the case of my digital photos, they're simply my photos.

Some people don't like the 'watermarks' or 'tags', they're actually banned by this site unless posted by the 'owner' of the pics. In reality, I'm doing the 'downloader' a favor if he wants to post them elsewhere(i.e. 'Flickr'). The 'downloader' can use the "Posted@OneClickChicks.com" to demonstrate that he obtained them legally, posted by the owner on a free site. It's the 'downloader/reposter's' firewall. Whereas, if a 'downloader/reposter' should happen to post a picture here or elsewhere that has been cropped to remove the tag, he could find himself/herself in deep doo-doo. That's why/how Alex has absolved himself of all responsibility here. Otherwise he could find himself in violation of the propogation of copyrighted material. He and the moderators remove all watermarked pics. Any 'cropped' pictures that are posted become the responsibility of the poster. To their credit, some people(i.e. 'Klondike') add a comment like "Found these on the Flickr" to their post. As long as they maintain their links and the pictures remain on the linked site, they've shifted the legal responsibility.

I'm not a lawyer and don't claim to know about all issues regarding copyright. But I do retain a lawyer and take issue with your comment, "In the US, the photographer automatically has all rights...". If I were you("I'm a photographer..."), I think I would revisit this issue with your lawyer in regards to "expectation of privacy", "contracted photography", and "model releases". In regards to "expectation of privacy" many people here could find themselves in court for 'upskirt' and 'downblouse' pictures. The photographer could face legal issues for invasion of privacy and has no legal right to those pictures. If someone simply flashes for you, they may still have an expectation of privacy. That's why in most of my series of pictures(i.e. the one you replied to) I've always got a picture or two, even if it's not posted(I don't ever post them all) that either shows other people in the background or forefront. The subjects have 'no expectations of privacy'. In regards to "contracted photography", if someone pays the photographer to take the pictures, the payer owns the rights to the pictures, not the photographer. In regards to "model releases", even if the photographer pays a model to pose, he needs a "model release" acknowledging ownership and rights to 'distribution'. The 'rights to distribution' is key. It's possible to 'own' the pictures and not have the 'rights to distribution'.

I'm an amateur photographer even though I've been doing it for close to 50 years. I started out taking pictures of car wrecks and such and submitting them to the local newspapers, LOL. Again, I appreciate your concerns and I HOPE I've got all my bases covered.