One Click Chicks Forum

One Click Chicks Forum (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/index.php)
-   Exhibitionists & Public Voyeur (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   More Spencer Tunick pics! (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?t=73568)

campingfan 03-09-2010 06:09 AM

has someone the pics from vienna (footballstadium)
or does anyone have a link to to the pics?

Thanks

crispus 03-09-2010 12:51 PM

10 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by campingfan (Post 675364)
has someone the pics from vienna (footballstadium)
or does anyone have a link to to the pics?

Thanks

I think you will find most of them in this thread begun by the eminent stevin6: https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?p=419795 (to which, I confess, yours truly also contributed); incidentally, you could have found them, as well as various others scattered about OCC, by using the handy "Search" button on the User Control Panel and entering "Vienna": I find the feature most useful when I also click the "Show posts" rather than the "Show threads" option.

Meanwhile, for completists or aficionados of covered nudity, here are pictures I haven't yet seen here, of Tunick at the naked sushi event that was used to kick off promotion of the Sydney installations. I'd have preferred to see more of the naughty bits, but at least the woman was actually naked under those leaves...

falksalt 03-12-2010 04:24 AM

no one have more pictures on this event?

dugan5000 03-12-2010 09:31 PM

Aussie Tunick girls - porn models it seems...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Klondike (Post 672292)
Is it me, or do those two babes in front look photoshopped in? I mean, whats up? You don't generally see babes like that posing in Tunick pics. Either they were photoshopped or they crashed the party as they do not appear to be part of the pack..

Klondike

First time poster:
Klondike, those two babes appear to be in porn. See this link to an Australian magazine:
(http) staging.picturemag.com/index.php?option=com_weblinks&catid=17&Itemid=50

I can't post the full link because I'm new.
The black haired woman appears to be on the cover of the mag in the top right picture.

Klondike 03-12-2010 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dugan5000 (Post 676702)
First time poster:
Klondike, those two babes appear to be in porn. See this link to an Australian magazine:
(http) staging.picturemag.com/index.php?option=com_weblinks&catid=17&Itemid=50

I can't post the full link because I'm new.
The black haired woman appears to be on the cover of the mag in the top right picture.

well, I am curious. then it sounds like maybe they did crash the shoot to do a little self promotion. Because I doubt Spence invited them.

I'm all for babes using public nudity events as a backdrop or excuse to promote their own naked agenda. It seems like its being done more and more. I mean, its OK as so long as they don't turn every event into NAP or something, though.

This would make for an interesting topic to discuss. The scenario goes like this: There are tons of women out there who want to be seen, and who perhaps 5 years ago started up their own site or something. But most solo girl sites pedaling typical babe pics get pitifully low traffic, and so eventually they closed down. But the desire for internet exposure never dies. So, seeing how popular these events and their pics are, they plot a new strategy. And that strategy is to get naked and crash these events figuring they will be loaded with photographers who will guarantee them widespread exposure - much wider than they ever got before with their own little website. Instant stardom! This strategy makes perfect sense. Just go with the flow. Might even be partially why Fremont ridership is up the past few years.

Klondike

MagicRabbit 03-14-2010 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klondike (Post 676720)
well, I am curious. then it sounds like maybe they did crash the shoot to do a little self promotion. Because I doubt Spence invited them.
[...]

No... there is no special "Background" check or somethin like this. You can give your e-mail and the place you live to Tunicks Website. Then you get an invitation to the event if you match the skin color.
I was invited to his shoot in Vienna (in which I couldn't participate because I had exams during the shoot-time), so it would have been easy for them to get the invitation to the shooting.

Klondike 03-14-2010 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicRabbit (Post 677548)
No... there is no special "Background" check or somethin like this. You can give your e-mail and the place you live to Tunicks Website. Then you get an invitation to the event if you match the skin color.
I was invited to his shoot in Vienna (in which I couldn't participate because I had exams during the shoot-time), so it would have been easy for them to get the invitation to the shooting.

Ok, yeah - thats true. I think I was really alluding more to Tunick's philosophy that would seem to not be in tune with what they were doing.

Klondike

flanker7 03-15-2010 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dugan5000 (Post 676702)
First time poster:
Klondike, those two babes appear to be in porn. See this link to an Australian magazine:
(http) staging.picturemag.com/index.php?option=com_weblinks&catid=17&Itemid=50

I can't post the full link because I'm new.
The black haired woman appears to be on the cover of the mag in the top right picture.

Dugan, the sleeve tattoo design on the brunette in the thumbnail you linked appears different than in the Tunick shoot above. Specifically, it's more filled-in in the Tunick photos. It's possible it's the same girl and that she had altered/added to her tattoo between shoots, or it's a different girl. Since the link you provided is just a thumbnail, it's tough to tell. Since there are a ton of girls out there with black hair and sleeve tattoos, I wouldn't bet the farm on it.

At the moment I'd err on the side of saying this is much ado about nothing, and that they're just two more girls participating in the shoot, albeit a bit different from what we're used to seeing at these things. When you break it down, what makes them stand out? I think we're throw off a bit just because they're tan and fit, unlike a lot of the arty girls we're used to seeing. Who knows, maybe theyr'e strippers. Can't strippers like art too?

However, there are a couple other things pointing to the possibility they could indeed be budding adult starlets out for exposure. Let's not forget they also appeared in a cap above from the morning TV show (of which I'm still waiting for the video), so perhaps they were planted there in advance for just that purpose. I mean, how many women out there would be willing to appear naked--albeit censored--live on a national program? So maybe we have a bit of mainstream and adult media synergy.

On the flipside, are the two possibilities mutually exclusive? Maybe they are involved in the adult industry (even just as strippers or whatever) but they still just wanted to participate in the shoot for its own sake, not as a publicity ploy? If it were a publicity stunt, wouldn't a search of the internet yield some results? I searched every possible combination of search terms and nothing came up to indicate any porn star(let) was involved in the Sydney shoot. If it were done for the sake of exposure, then by definition wouldn't we know about it? So maybe everyone's right and it's just a weird well-intended collision of the porn and art worlds.

ENFFan01 03-15-2010 07:46 AM

They're porn models, unfortunately, but the shoot isn't from the issue in that picture in the top right (though I think that is still one of the models involved). I have the issue of the magazine - two pages on the Tunick shoot, but mainly focusing on those two girls (who are 2/3 of the Sexpo Showgirls striptease team that appears at Australia's Sexpo, for those interested).

I've got mixed feelings about using Tunick shoots for these things - I can imagine some people wouldn't enjoy suddenly turning up in the pages of a porn mag after getting out there for what is ostensibly an art project, especially like in this issue where the ones that happened to end up at the edges of the crowd get reasonably high-res close-ups published. There's a difference between ENF (hot) and being genuinely upset to find yourself in a porn mag (not hot).

That said, I have jerked it quite a bit to photos of these events I've found on the net, so maybe it's the profit motive involved that makes me feel a bit uneasy about it.

Fango 03-15-2010 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENFFan01 (Post 677701)
They're porn models, unfortunately, but the shoot isn't from the issue in that picture in the top right (though I think that is still one of the models involved). I have the issue of the magazine - two pages on the Tunick shoot, but mainly focusing on those two girls (who are 2/3 of the Sexpo Showgirls striptease team that appears at Australia's Sexpo, for those interested).

I've got mixed feelings about using Tunick shoots for these things - I can imagine some people wouldn't enjoy suddenly turning up in the pages of a porn mag after getting out there for what is ostensibly an art project, especially like in this issue where the ones that happened to end up at the edges of the crowd get reasonably high-res close-ups published. There's a difference between ENF (hot) and being genuinely upset to find yourself in a porn mag (not hot).

That's fucking pathetic. Piggybacking your porn on a man's artwork. If I were Tunick or one of the other people who ended up in the pictures, I would definitely be considering a lawsuit.

And, hopefully Tunick will be more careful about screening out this kind of shit in the future. :cool:

Fango


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Forum RulesTerms of UseTerms of ServiceDMCA18 U.S.C. § 2257RTA VerifiedPrivacy Policy