| Fango |
01-29-2014 08:02 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbhubby
(Post 1711236)
Fango, you've done it again. Of the three pics you removed that you said were pro pics one of the girls is on multiple other threads including this one (the red head), one I'm guessing you are interpreting as a pro pic because of the pose (the one with the scooter) and the third (in the laundry) I have absolutely no clue why you found reason to delete it. I've tried to follow your guidelines from the last time this happened but it obviously hasn't helped.
|
1. The redhead is Sarah Kay. She does appear in some amateur pictures, at public nudity events, but has also done pro photoshoots for pay sites. The picture that you posted was from the latter category (most likely from the site nudeinsf).
2. The second picture was removed because it looked like a pro pic: it was lit professionally, the image was very high quality, and the subject appeared to be a model, both appearance-wise and, yes, because she was posing like a model. If it looks like a pro pic, it most likely is a pro pic. These are the criteria I use when determining whether or not to remove a picture for being pro. I don't know what else to tell you. Either take it or leave it.
3. The third picture was from Abby Winters, a pay site.
I hope you've noticed that you have not been punished (i.e. banned) for posting pro pics. Accidentally posting pics that break the rules is not cause for banning. We tend not to ban unless the rules are broken intentionally or maliciously. That said, if it bothers you this much just to have your pictures removed, then maybe you're better off not posting here.
Fango |
