One Click Chicks Forum

One Click Chicks Forum (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/index.php)
-   ENF - Embarrassed Nude Females (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   VidPro Strikes Again! (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?t=34693)

msnevil 09-25-2006 12:33 AM

3 Attachment(s)
Sorry forgot to post these. One pic is for others to do.

The other, well some of the older gentlemen might like. :p A (Gilf?)

vidpro 09-25-2006 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by msnevil
I think Vidpro is wrong on his "guess".

As I said before, I didn't guess. I won't guess. It's either available for reveal or not. If I can't improve an image, and do it accurately, I won't do it.

vidpro 09-25-2006 01:00 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by msnevil
Respectfully, Vidpro.

The only time guess work is not involved. Is when you can see the Visible see through with your own eye. (Which is why a lot of Photoshop people will only do Photoshop’s on "visible" aspects of the body.)

You see Photoshop is not 100% effective in illuminating what is underneath.


I can see through clearly. I've developed a talent to detect small amounts of contrast, not only with my own eye, but with tools I've built to assist me. However, this image is obvious to me even without the aid of software tools. I recommend increasing the brightness of your monitor if you can't see it. Here's an image to help illustrate the change in contrast levels. I'm sure that some people can't see it. But there will be others who can, and I'm one of them. I hope this helps.

knoxville182 09-25-2006 02:58 AM

you guys are cute.

it's funny, when i posted this image, i was intending on the girl on the left (blue shirt), but you guys both saw something in the one on the right. to my eye, the blue shirt has a nip waiting to be shown, but you guys both went for the purple. either way, i'm glad it keeps getting reposted.

thanks again.

msnevil 09-25-2006 04:05 AM

:)

To be honest, I can see how you got the results you did. And the same for mine.

But I won't work under the illusion that there is absolute certainity on this. I have worked many years on Celebrity collage's. And have seen the "nipple wars" happen over and over. One person see's a nip, another see's nothing. Name's start flying over human perceptions. Each one Certain he is right.

I have no "ego" to defend. Probability suggests that her nipple should be with in line of her suntan. But then agian her Dress pushes to the right side. She has two contrasting image's. One inside the suntan line, the other on the outskirt's. The higher probability lies with the inner one. (But hey, I can see why you came to your conclusion, Vidpro.)

The problem with the picture though is its lack of good resolution, poor light and severe blurring. Unsharp mask, contrasting, brightening can only help so much with a poor picture.

To be honest with knoxville, I thought I saw a clear nip with the left girl. But she is wearing a Bra. Leading to a higher probability that we are seeing a bra design illuminated by the bulb flash. Under Contrast, I can see a faint bra design on the left side as well. (But hey, once agian. The light perhaps is "seeing" through the bra. I doubt it, but the possibility is always there.)

And we both could be right. The right girl has double nipple's, But once agian. Probability is low for that. :p



Quote:

Originally Posted by vidpro
As I said before, I didn't guess. I won't guess. It's either available for reveal or not. If I can't improve an image, and do it accurately, I won't do it.


msnevil 09-25-2006 04:27 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Something is wrong with this pic. The guy sniffs the girl, the other guy sniffs the guy. :eek:

Somebody else can do the other pics.

alenio1 09-25-2006 11:55 AM

Please... let me see her nipple!

alenio1 09-25-2006 12:03 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Sorry the pic

thefonz 09-25-2006 10:41 PM

4 Attachment(s)
Hoping for some assistance on these pics, removing the blurs from the vidcaps...

Actually from a post to another forum here, but I'm hoping to gain some assistance, until I can procure my own version of photoshop..

If anyone could tell me if its worth it to try on these vidcaps, please, let me know...Thanks...

850r 09-25-2006 10:55 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I can't seem to get anything from this one but someone else might be able too. Believe it or not it is actually a braless set of boobs on here... Let see it from the experts!!

americanguy0010 09-27-2006 01:44 PM

maybe the stars are too black
 
3 Attachment(s)
but i would be thankful if you tried

americanguy0010 09-27-2006 01:54 PM

or this sweddish girl
 
3 Attachment(s)
the last one i had to make smaller to upload

maxim230 09-27-2006 02:26 PM

2 Attachment(s)
anyone try this one....cheers!

ed75 09-27-2006 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by americanguy0010
but i would be thankful if you tried

i think the first two pictures are of girls in this thread and theres lots of pics with no stars or hearts in the zip: https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/show...ghlight=laurel

bigi442000 09-27-2006 11:44 PM

1 Attachment(s)
You see how easy it can be!

desktop123 09-28-2006 12:40 AM

unmasking
 
Found a webpage with tutorial and software that unmask pixeled photos




http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Dojo/4051/ramfaq01.htm

bigi442000 09-30-2006 01:56 PM

4 Attachment(s)
Well?

teller 10-01-2006 08:52 AM

3 Attachment(s)
on a similar note ...

John_badau 10-01-2006 06:02 PM

The last three are fakes!

They where around two years ago, there a lot of thembut they where all fake.


Look at the fisrt one, it a jean skirt, how can you look throught denim?

vidpro 10-01-2006 09:07 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by msnevil

I posted my saved "contrast". Let others see what I work with. (And as always, I welcome a civilized challenge, and constructive criticism. I have been wrong in the past, and learn from my mistake’s. Lets see if others can state the same. )

What I did:
Magic wand tool>auto-leveled>local area contrast Radius 150, local area 1> manual levels, darkened highlights 50%, underlined my probable guess 50%.


I think your software doesn't produce as good of results as mine does. If you are generating results like this from primarily auto-levels and contrast adjustment, you're going to have a hard time enhancing the luminance levels. When the results are pixelized to that degree, I recommend reducing the work area (like I did) so that you don't have to exagerate the differences between so many pixels. Iv'e included a more basic example of what my software does when using just basic functions, along with the results of your auto-levels and contrast.

I went a slightly different route:

Polygon Lasso tool (focused on a more limited area) -> Contrast +50 -> Hue -20 -> Manual levels, darkened mid-range 30% -> Brightened +25, did not underline anything, did not run any additional enhancement tools I normally do.

vidpro 10-01-2006 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John_badau
The last three are fakes!

They where around two years ago, there a lot of thembut they where all fake.


Look at the fisrt one, it a jean skirt, how can you look throught denim?


I've seen these before. If I remember right, these are novelty skirts, painted to look like they are see-through.

vidpro 10-01-2006 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigi442000
Well?

Very nice. You're getting quite good at this.

Fritzyy 10-01-2006 09:27 PM

Vidpro, Ty for the last fix of Ellen at the Christmas tree.

vidpro 10-01-2006 09:48 PM

No problem. Do you have any more "Ellens" that I haven't seen yet? :)

vidpro 10-01-2006 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritzyy
What happened to the simple "unblur and clear up" entries? :)

Was looking for more Ellen... this one is too blury to repair with decent results.

Fritzyy 10-02-2006 05:51 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Vidpro these are a couple I grabbed quickly.

shadow999 10-02-2006 10:53 AM

Who is she?? sounds like someone here knows her? :confused:

capcity 10-02-2006 04:25 PM

1 Attachment(s)
can you do anything with this one?

iggaman84 10-02-2006 09:19 PM

????

msnevil 10-03-2006 07:13 AM

Agian Vidpro, I'm no expert. The expert's are not found on this forum. The expert's are found on Website's Like Dai's. They not you nor me, Are the pro's.

I have had a discussion with them in the past on this subject. Thier input, Which I value over most anybody. Simply stated, What You and I Do is Fake to them.

My problem is that people are Claiming these as "Real". Not fake's. And a certain friend of mine is in the process of getting sued for making such a claim. (On a celebrity x-ray.)

And I'm not getting sued for a claim that I believe is "dishonest."

With that stated, What you listed below appears to get better results. Then what I did, Bravo!

May I ask, How does hue Help with with the x-ray appearence? Saturation, and light. I understand. Hue appears only to change the color to a more natural appearence.


Quote:

Originally Posted by vidpro
I think your software doesn't produce as good of results as mine does. If you are generating results like this from primarily auto-levels and contrast adjustment, you're going to have a hard time enhancing the luminance levels. When the results are pixelized to that degree, I recommend reducing the work area (like I did) so that you don't have to exagerate the differences between so many pixels. Iv'e included a more basic example of what my software does when using just basic functions, along with the results of your auto-levels and contrast.

I went a slightly different route:

Polygon Lasso tool (focused on a more limited area) -> Contrast +50 -> Hue -20 -> Manual levels, darkened mid-range 30% -> Brightened +25, did not underline anything, did not run any additional enhancement tools I normally do.


able2hate 10-04-2006 06:28 AM

1 Attachment(s)
This is a friend of mine, I hope if you can do something nice with this pic :)

kdma 10-04-2006 02:58 PM

bah never mind.

RandyJohnson 10-04-2006 04:16 PM

Interesting thread. I had pics of my wife on the net (not here) a few months ago with black sprayed on her face from Windows Paint program. I have since removed them after discovering that someone could pull her face out of it. (they could, too. They were a little opaque)

bigi442000 10-05-2006 08:21 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Not the best blur removal, but a worthy subject. Can you top it?

vidpro 10-05-2006 09:46 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by bigi442000
Not the best blur removal, but a worthy subject. Can you top it?

Very nice Bigi. I went ahead and took a crack at it too. You're right... it is a very worthy subject! :)

Fritzyy 10-05-2006 09:47 PM

You are both correct. She has a great frame! Thanks.

partialputter 10-05-2006 09:48 PM

Here's a nice little challenge
 
1 Attachment(s)
Here's a nice challenge.....and we can all benefit.
It's britney spears.
Although she is kinda skanky now....still would be nice to see her nips.
Her is a recent shot, and if you look close, you can see a small hint of an outline....
I hope...Good Luck!

maxim230 10-05-2006 11:26 PM

Unmasking
 
3 Attachment(s)
Vidpro if you could unmask this one... havent seen much of unmasked works recently...
i have also posted a few masked snaps earlier in this thread....

maxim230 10-05-2006 11:34 PM

Hey my first try!
 
1 Attachment(s)
Your comments pls...on my first attempt..

poa 10-06-2006 03:20 AM

3 Attachment(s)
ehi can i try me too to enhance something?

i hope you like this pic
this are the best for me

*****PROFESSIONAL PHOTO REMOVED*****


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Forum RulesTerms of UseTerms of ServiceDMCA18 U.S.C. § 2257RTA VerifiedPrivacy Policy