now we've got a way better edition :D

redhead girl
 

is this girl?

Great pictures, guys. Thanks for all your work compiling them into this thread. I think it is clear from these pictures that pubic hair is coming back into style. Thankfully! :D

Thread derailing in 3, 2, 1...

Quite the opposite - 5. DO NOT post a picture with the watermark edited out in order to circumvent rule #4.
Never assume. Unless the reason for removal is given look to the Rules for guidance.
6. DO NOT post or request any copyrighted material without the consent of the owner.
Any and all copyrighted pictures posted without the owners permission may be removed. Identification and removal may depend upon a complaint being raised. If such a complaint is raised it is correct for removal to occur. Seeking to disguise a copyright picture so that such a complaint is likely to be avoided just adds a level of deceit to the copyright infringement.
Not complex at all. Copyright automatically exists upon creation of the image and remains unless relinquished or limited by the owner. That is no different to a book or a song (which is also available at a single click on the web). You may be unaware of the copyright status of many images sourced on the web but beneath each Flickr image you altered and posted was clearly printed © All rights reserved.

great shots gonna look for some more Toronto Vids looks like they did a lot pre ride and post ride.. should be more out there...

Copyright is not complex. If a pic has been declared subject to copyright, any breach of this is a breach of copyright. Simple. Its not just books and songs that are subject to copyright. Images are as well. This site is starting to understand this as are other users. But breach copyright at your own peril, because this site has a clear understanding of its legal liabilities. Breach copyright, my friend and you are on your own. Just try the “its complex” argument before a judge when you are being sued.

first- it is complex because we are not talking about selling someone else's picture, we are sharing pictures that are not even on paid sites. pictures will always surf on the web, if not here, somewhere else, whatsapp groups... i dont know. this is simple uncontrollable

second- i'm sure you cannot take a picture of a girl on a beach and exploit it commercially without the girl's autorization, so this "copyright" is not entirely yours. If someone uses a picture on a commercial banner, it is easier the guy to be sued by the girl than by the photographer, because is her IMAGE that are being used incorrectly, and this is way more serious than the copyright of the photographer being breached

Madison WNBR
 

Watermarked album on flickr here:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/papa_r...45981831/page1

Photographs of excellent quality if a little small; still rather that than out of focus pics of riders with sharp images of buildings behind.

Copyright and Privacy
 

1. Copyright is complicated. Remember that contributors to this thread have, over the last three weeks, posted photographs from the UK, Belgium and the USA. All have different copyright laws. They may be similar but they will not be the same.
2. Simply claiming copyright cannot protect something which is not copyrighted. However to be clear taking a photograph is a creative act and the photograph will be capable of protection even if it is a picture of the Statue of Liberty or the Tower of London.
3. There would appear to be some confusion between copyright and privacy. Again privacy is a minefield across jurisdictions but generally speaking someone in a public place has no right to privacy. Someone riding naked around Brighton can hardly claim an expectation of privacy so my photographs, for instance, are safe from that issue.