One Click Chicks Forum - VidPro Strikes Again!

Page 5 of 14

Last »

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

One Click Chicks Forum (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/index.php)

- ENF - Embarrassed Nude Females (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4)

- - VidPro Strikes Again! (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?t=34693)

AzazelX

09-13-2006 04:01 AM

Thanks !!

Thanks.

Great job !!. It's amazing.

Regards.

gadgetman

09-14-2006 12:53 AM

a fashion quickie

2 Attachment(s)

found this quick and easy mod from the "Fashion" thread, thought i'd share.

enjoy.

shadow999

09-14-2006 03:37 PM

Thanks for the pointers, I will try it out!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by msnevil

Using photoshop.

1)Use magic tool Bar. (Keytab: W)

a)Under options at top: select (double box) Add to select.

b)set tolerance to 20: Make sure anti-alias, contigous, and sample layers are checked.

c)Highlight all of her white shirt.

2)Now right click on her shirt.

a)Under the opened pop up options select: layer via copy. (you should now have a another picture opened labled:
Layer 1.

3)Under enhance tab: select Auto-levels.

4)Under filters tab: select option: Noise. On the menu pop up select :reduce noise. Set reduce color noise slider to desired level. (Enough to keep the original desired color at the same time reducing the auto levels "Color Noise" effect. (Btw- The Auto-levels didn't add to much color noise. Since you selected a very specific color earlier under the Magic tool bar. Hint: The more colors there are when Auto-leveling, the more the color noise is introduced.)

5)Under enhance menu select: Auto color selection. (The picture should have a red tinge instead of a "blue" tinge.)

6)Now under layers (Bottom right hand corner. Select the forward arrow by opacity. Slide the Bar left-right to achieve the right desired blended effect. (btw: Don't forget to click the box beside the background image. There should be a eye by it.) For the sake of this tutorial I selected opacity 75%. Now left click <More> above opacity. A menu will pop up. Select Merge Visable.

Save pic, post on occ. (Notice there is a lot more that can be done. But for now, This will help to reduce the color noise added by auto-levels.)

Anyway, feel free to post some more. The more you do, the better you get. And perhaps you sometime later can give me a few pointers. ;)

cmurda

09-14-2006 04:54 PM

1 Attachment(s)

can this one be enhanced at all?

bigtyme420

09-14-2006 06:06 PM

2 Attachment(s)

Here is a few that I hope someone can do something with. I was able to make the edits that msevil had posted to make it easier to work with.

cmurda

09-14-2006 09:55 PM

1 Attachment(s)

whoops...changed the resolution to make it better to work with

msnevil

09-15-2006 04:18 AM

1 Attachment(s)

Nice job, bigtyme420. :D

Though, I'm afraid what you did is all that can be seen. There is not enough light to illuminate what's under neath.

cmurda: the sheet wrinkles seem to distort the image. it appears to have some illumiation underneath. But I don't have enough detail to work with. Any further photoshoping whould be a worthless cause, Sorry.

I posted the fashion pic as a way to show more photoshop exp's.

1) Bluring. The bluring brush can be used to further enhance the image to the human eye.

For exp.

1)Bluring the background produces a 3d effect and help to focus the attention on the closest object. Namly, the models.

2)Bluring of the Face will remove blemish's. A warning though, too much Bluring will remove details or give it a "glamour shot" fantasy look.

3)Bluring the edge's of a recent layered image. Helps to remove the fringe discolorations. Giving the image more of a realistic look, and removing the "pasted on" appearence.

Try to Add color to the skin at 10% opacity, And then Click "color correction." What happens? More color is added to the underlying skin color. (a little adds clarity, too much ruins it.)

Like wise desaturation will help remove some of the leveled Heavy paint look.

(Edit: might help if I added the pics. :rolleyes: )

msnevil

09-15-2006 04:28 AM

1 Attachment(s)

hmm,..

nooch

09-15-2006 07:14 AM

can you do anything with these two hotties?

1 Attachment(s)

how about it?

msnevil

09-16-2006 02:31 AM

Not enough is revealed with the limited light. Sorry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nooch

how about it?

Wild Lynette

09-16-2006 08:02 PM

Amazing!

4 Attachment(s)

WOW, I love your threads, very hot. Would any of these pics work? ;-)

msnevil

09-17-2006 03:44 AM

4 Attachment(s)

"But the pics are fun to look at nevertheless! "

And it's fun to watch me get lectured by professor Vidpro for a bad guess. :p

Speaking of which, Did he go on another sabbatical?

Some photobckt grabs for others to alter. Wife needs attention, and photoshopping can wait. ;)

vidpro

09-17-2006 03:14 PM

1 Attachment(s)

A new one I found in another thread. She was covering, but she didn't count on me being able to see through.

knoxville182

09-19-2006 06:32 AM

1 Attachment(s)

please please please ...anyone have any luck here?

knoxville182

09-19-2006 06:35 AM

1 Attachment(s)

orhere?

thefonz

09-19-2006 11:55 PM

Vidpro - someone is seeking your services

Vidpro, please see this thread:

https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?t=37720

Just posted to the Sexy Vids section. Sounds like he's calling out for your assistance, from what I can tell...

I am also interested in what you might be able to do with this..

gadgetman

09-20-2006 07:00 AM

a quickie fix

1 Attachment(s)

for your enjoyment

TyedinKnots

09-20-2006 10:18 PM

Fantastic!

3 Attachment(s)

I don't know how I missed this thread for so long! Wonderful work! Would pics like these work?

msnevil

09-21-2006 10:41 PM

6 Attachment(s)

Some Illuminated.

Some type of Cloth reflection prevents see through. ->989838117_l[1] (polyester rubber?)
Not Enough light. ->DSC00033_1a

docdude316

09-22-2006 12:12 AM

Try these please

Can anyone try these pictures they're of Alexis Bledel from the Gilmore Girls and yes she is over 18 in these pictures.

*****WATERMARKED PHOTOS REMOVED*****

msnevil

09-22-2006 05:30 AM

Sorry, Docdude we don't enhance watermarked Collage's.

:eek: I just noticed I altered a "kreuk" fake. (Edit: 15 minute, Can't delete pic.)

msnevil

09-22-2006 06:50 AM

1 Attachment(s)

A real "well photoshoped" kreuk pic.

knoxville182

09-22-2006 08:42 PM

1 Attachment(s)

maybe?

vidpro

09-23-2006 12:23 PM

1 Attachment(s)

A request someone sent to me. Enjoy...

vidpro

09-23-2006 12:41 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Here's another. I could only get one side to come through... (I tried to get both though...)

vidpro

09-23-2006 12:55 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Lindsay Lohan

vidpro

09-23-2006 01:21 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Censorship removed...

vidpro

09-23-2006 01:48 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Censorship removal. Covering a face with a negative filter is not a smart way to go...

bigi442000

09-23-2006 06:32 PM

1 Attachment(s)

A bit easy, I admit. Still.........

msnevil

09-24-2006 05:01 AM

1 Attachment(s)

illuminated.

docdude316

09-24-2006 03:21 PM

Sorry

Quote:

Originally Posted by msnevil

Sorry, Docdude we don't enhance watermarked Collage's.

:eek: I just noticed I altered a "kreuk" fake. (Edit: 15 minute, Can't delete pic.)

Sorry about that I didn't even notice the watermarks. I'm trying to find a version of the red carpet pic without the watermark.

docdude316

09-24-2006 03:50 PM

Can we try these?

1 Attachment(s)

After a little bit of searching I found these two images of Alexis Bledel at the Matrix Revolutions premiere. As far as I can tell they don't have any watermarks. They're too large to upload as is and I don't know how to reduce the file size so I zipped them. If you can't work on these just let me know. Sorry for any trouble.

vidpro

09-24-2006 04:40 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by knoxville182

maybe?

As always, no guesswork or painted-on nipples from me. Just contrast and brightness enhancement for accurate see thru depiction.

I could only see through one side, but it turned out pretty good for a somewhat blury picture.

Lump	09-24-2006 04:49 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Who can do this one?

vidpro

09-24-2006 04:50 PM

1 Attachment(s)

See thru enhancement...

vidpro

09-24-2006 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lump

Who can do this one?

I can...

I'll do it right now.

vidpro

09-24-2006 05:18 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lump

Who can do this one?

I got rid of some of the censorship... the quality was low, so it was tricky to get rid of all of the censorship. However, I also did some photo resotration on the image.

Fritzyy

09-24-2006 08:28 PM

Those boobs look familiar. Good work men!

knoxville182

09-24-2006 08:52 PM

5 Attachment(s)

i found these in a webshots folder, they all seem to meet the criteria.
thanks for all the good work.

msnevil

09-25-2006 01:17 AM

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by vidpro

Respectfully, Vidpro.

The only time guess work is not involved. Is when you can see the Visible see through with your own eye. (Which is why a lot of Photoshop people will only do Photoshop’s on "visible" aspects of the body.)

You see Photoshop is not 100% effective in illuminating what is underneath. (Contrary to what I have seen on this forum, and other's.) There is never 100% certainty. Unless you see it with your visible eye. We use different techniques to Increase our chances of noting what is not "seen". For exp. Vidpro stated contrast\brightness.

Also, I have thought about posting this in the past. But Have decided to avoid the subject. Now is the time. Some see a "nipple slip". Others "don't". The same goes with Photoshop’s. It is in the eye of the beholder. (Unless it's plainly visible. It's always guess work. )

For exp. I think Vidpro is wrong on his "guess". (Now we see how he reacts to a friendly challenge. ;)

I posted my saved "contrast". Let others see what I work with. (And as always, I welcome a civilized challenge, and constructive criticism. I have been wrong in the past, and learn from my mistake’s. Lets see if others can state the same. )

What I did:
Magic wand tool>auto-leveled>local area contrast Radius 150, local area 1> manual levels, darkened highlights 50%, underlined my probable guess 50%.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 PM.

Page 5 of 14

Last »

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Forum Rules • Terms of Use • Terms of Service • DMCA • 18 U.S.C. § 2257• RTA Verified • Privacy Policy