Originally Posted by brunettesrule (Post 2970030)

As far as I can tell, the group that is the subject of this thread has always been all female, the subjects in the photos have been 99.5% female, and the "Co-ed" is just some kind of ironic adjective. If the group has introduced some kind of new rule as far as men go, you can't tell by looking at the photos. I also don't see what would have changed sexually by making the group somehow exclusively female - I'm guessing that most of them are bi or lesbian anyway.

Originally Posted by Bill Johnson (Post 2970203)

co-ed when applied to an institution means it accepts women, co-ed applied to a person means they are a young educated female. It's not ironic, just a different use of the word.

Originally Posted by JanniR (Post 2970206)

There used to be at least one man visible in every third or fourth shoot they put up. Male SOs were welcome at their meetings, including their nude rooftop jaunts, and everyone seemed comfortable (emphasis on "seemed"). The key point here is that this new group made it a rule that cis men aren't welcome. So now we're just speculating endlessly about what went wrong (though I gave my own theory a few posts up).

Originally Posted by dertysanchezz (Post 2970340)

We'll never know for sure what happened. And to be honest it doesn't really matter. It seems that the party is over one way or the other. Things like this usually pop up and vanish just as quickly. If there is anything to be surprised about I'd be surprised that it went on for as long as it did. Fortunately for us perverts, photos on the internet last forever.

Originally Posted by upkilted (Post 3007531)

Captured from the Internet Wayback machine. Part 1 of 2