For what it's worth, the new group's anti-man rule doesn't necessarily need to be stemming from anything that happened to the old group. A lot of the original group consisted of women who disliked men, and I'm sure that they are happy to be able to rule them out of this splinter group.

Only one thing to do then...post all the photos that we managed to grab before the went down! Here's a couple of the hot brunette with tattoos..

And a cute redhead..

the redhead is in the band cannibal girls. i'm sure you can find her instagram with this info. :)

I was aware of the first & third you mention here, but not the second. However, the one I was referring to was indeed the third one.

Underaged
 

Hello

I wanted to give a fair warning:
The reason that all of the pictures were taken down and the issue may stem from a girl that lied about her age and was not 18.

I would advise that you remove all the images to protect yourselves

I live in NYC and just spoke with someone who has some info on the subject and although I cannot confirm who or what actually happened... it does appear that there may be underaged girls in some of the photos (I have no idea which/who)

In my opinion there's nothing pornographic about the pictures, so it shouldn't be a problem. I suppose an over-zealous prosecutor could try to make an issue of it, but only if he had a grudge against you personally and had cause to search your HD.

Big surprise there
 

Just fascinating all-around. That comment about no "CIS males" speaks volumes. To make that part of the rules means that it's 90% sure one of the women, actively participating in the "club" and advocating for group sex activities, got PO'd when her male S.O. and another woman decided that they were enjoying each other's "company" in the group... a lot. They most likely cheated on the first woman which means the lying is to be condemned.
BUT, she then tears down the site across all platforms in a fit of pique, and instead of blaming herself for having taken this too far, or blaming the other woman, then decides straight guys were the problem and only gays will be "safe" to have in this club from now on.
When they re-launch, it will be with the cloak of hypocrisy: They're no longer inclusive, they're prejudiced against a whole group of people based on the actions of a few, AND: Clearly, their whole idea about nudity being non-sexual doesn't mean nature won't take its course. Even before this latest incident, they'd begun acting in more sexualized activities while insisting it was all about how nudity doesn't necessarily mean sex.
Which is true. But they forgot we're dealing with human beings here.

As far as I can tell, the group that is the subject of this thread has always been all female, the subjects in the photos have been 99.5% female, and the "Co-ed" is just some kind of ironic adjective. If the group has introduced some kind of new rule as far as men go, you can't tell by looking at the photos. I also don't see what would have changed sexually by making the group somehow exclusively female - I'm guessing that most of them are bi or lesbian anyway.

co-ed when applied to an institution means it accepts women, co-ed applied to a person means they are a young educated female. It's not ironic, just a different use of the word.