How's this for unblurred?

Almost too easy

Hey Bigi did you try the ones i posted above????

i am freaking dying to find out who sent them to me.

Just wondering.

thanks

excellent!! id like to see some of your work on jessica simpson,maybe the new see through blue dress pics

Are we alloed to do celebs? I thought that would get us banned. Anyway, try these for now

Hey man please try this one when you get a chance, this is a friend of mine.

http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/8...631995lrl8.jpg

Ok you gotta let us know how you did that one....I cant get anywhere close to that good on it.

Got carried away enhancing the scenery, and forgot the woman. :rolleyes: (Ran out of time. As usual.)

Somebody else want to have a go at it.

have at it

chuck

Hey there. I don't want to burst your bubble, but that last picture isn't even close to accurate. It looks like you just drew nipples on her. The purpose of all of this is to enhance what's already there, not to just make stuff up. I know it can be fun to work on this kind of stuff, but please keep the enhancements to actual details. It's not worth it if people think that what they're seeing is not real. It's important to enhance what's already visible in an accurate and revealing way. Anything less is just fake.

No disrespect intended... I just want to set everyone on the right track here.

Respectfully, I wasn't trying to "fake" it. I was attempting to use leveled interpolations for detection. (I was half way asleep, I might add when doing it. Hence why I ran out of time.)

"t's important to enhance What's Already Visible in an accurate and revealing way. "

Understood, If it's not detectable with the naked eye. Then don't do it at all. ie WAV

Btw- I really don't think the last picture can be detected by the visible eye. Due to the Dark color, resolution and lack of illumination. I was attempting to compensate for this by changing color curve's. For better luminosity.

Anyway, my experiment was a failure. And I might add, I posted the wrong pic anyway. :( (i meant to post the illuminated pic only. Not the colorized one.) Alex, or whom ever could you please "delete" the last two pics.

btw- How did you "detect" the last pic, I really don't think it can be done. If you can tell me how you would do it. I would be appreciative.

For Vidpro or whomever. Is there a way to improve the contrast to reveal more details in this picture?

used auto-levels, a little midtone contrast, and local area enhancement.

Great job man! Can you try this? :)

Too much colorization makes it look drawed on, best to leave it simple. To avoid my earlier mistake.

Any suggestions encouraged. (Note: my time is limited. One or two pix max every couple day and please use higher resolution pics. Over 800*600 preferred.)

can you do anything with this one?
 

sorry, posted it earlier, didn't know if anyone had given it a shot.

I proberly know where the nipple is at, I have a good guess at the areola stops. But as you can see below. The details only lead to guessing due to lack of resolution, Lack of transparency and lack of background illumination.

how about this picture? i think it's the same girl...

1) She has a bikini padding hiding the detail, and She's most likely shaved. She also has a clit ring?

thanks man
 

appreciate all the help...any luck with this one?

can someone try this one and the others that i've posted?

i don't have image editing software

Capcity, I need a bigger pic please.

do you mean higher resolution?

Capcity: Yes I need a higher resolution. Sorry, I should have been more specific.

(Change of subject.) Also pussymagnet: I already have enhanced one of your pics. But right now, I am waiting to see if somebody else will contribute?

I know Vidpro in the past has stated he is busy with his outside life\job. As well as the rest of us.

Let us see if somebody will attempt your pic, and if not. In a couple days, I will post the pic myself.

Respectfully, Nobody can not do webcam pics. The low resolution makes it impossible to even repair the image. My as well "enhance" it.

see if this works...thanks in advance. i appreciate all your effort.

Well?

Excellent as always!!! :D

See more
 

Hi !!

can you show us more from this picture ?

who has told you I have removed her head ?. Fistro, que tas hesho un peaso fistro cabestrero.

One for the pros...I suck at this haha
 

Can you guys unblur this?...I just get this zombie-like scary looking thing...I'm not quite catching on I guess..anyways here it is

My friend, I am not angry, just the pic is as is, I have no other version of it. You have thought I have cut her head and you have said without knowledge.

I think it is an interesting picture (with or without head) for X-Ray digging, there is a slight see-through.

Bye every body

Trust me was right. Where is the fun of doing a decapitated head?

Original, contrast, illumination, Colorized.

It won't work, sorry.

With such a small resolution, The lack in contrasting detail and lack of adequate back ground illumination. Makes the picture impossible to do.

Rule of thumb, The pic needs to be at least close to 800*600 resolution, have a adequate back ground light, and the clothing transparent enough to let light through.

here's another i found...anyone have any luck here? thanks in advance.

Not great,

Ask shown below. If the middle gal had no "bra" on. Her breasts would be illuminated. But since she has a bra on. That show's instead.

I can't illuminate past bra's or undershirts.

Bathing suits, usually. If it has no liner's. Nightie's, lingerie, etc. Are other exp's that can be done.

If the light can contact some of the skin. Then yes, I can enhance those details. Otherwise, its impossible. Sorry.

Good start. Each time you practice, you get better. I might suggest using layer's at 25-50% blended with the original pic and\or reduce color noise (25-75%) to remove the Auto levels color effect's.

Either way, its not good. But it isn't bad either. ;)

I wish I knew how to do that, but I did not see it explained in the other thread.....

Using photoshop.

1)Use magic tool Bar. (Keytab: W)

a)Under options at top: select (double box) Add to select.

b)set tolerance to 20: Make sure anti-alias, contigous, and sample layers are checked.

c)Highlight all of her white shirt.

2)Now right click on her shirt.

a)Under the opened pop up options select: layer via copy. (you should now have a another picture opened labled:
Layer 1.

3)Under enhance tab: select Auto-levels.

4)Under filters tab: select option: Noise. On the menu pop up select :reduce noise. Set reduce color noise slider to desired level. (Enough to keep the original desired color at the same time reducing the auto levels "Color Noise" effect. (Btw- The Auto-levels didn't add to much color noise. Since you selected a very specific color earlier under the Magic tool bar. Hint: The more colors there are when Auto-leveling, the more the color noise is introduced.)

5)Under enhance menu select: Auto color selection. (The picture should have a red tinge instead of a "blue" tinge.)

6)Now under layers (Bottom right hand corner. Select the forward arrow by opacity. Slide the Bar left-right to achieve the right desired blended effect. (btw: Don't forget to click the box beside the background image. There should be a eye by it.) For the sake of this tutorial I selected opacity 75%. Now left click <More> above opacity. A menu will pop up. Select Merge Visable.

Save pic, post on occ. (Notice there is a lot more that can be done. But for now, This will help to reduce the color noise added by auto-levels.)

Anyway, feel free to post some more. The more you do, the better you get. And perhaps you sometime later can give me a few pointers. ;)