![]() |
How do you check for the embedded thumbnail?
Photoshop is one of those things I someday have to work at, I just don't use it anywhere near it's advantage. |
4 Attachment(s)
Ah yes, the posters think they are protecting the nude female by blurring the revealing pics, yet showing the face on the clothed pics. Here is an example of such behavior (girl in blue shirt):
|
Quote:
Quote:
I also use a free program called EXIF Image Viewer (you can see them when you select the Thumbnails view). It's a lot faster (photoshop is overkill just for this). Some other image viewers show the embedded thumbnails when in "thumbnail" mode too. |
Quote:
|
Posts better with face covered...
8 Attachment(s)
this gal looks too much like Rodney Dangerfield -- should be more careful and blur them all
|
Still more
7 Attachment(s)
I think these were a true oops case. I was watching a thread on another board as these pictures were posted and all of a sudden the unblurred pic came up. The poster stopped posting right after that, the administrator took down the thread, and I haven't seen anything posted under their user name again. Unfortunately not too much is shown (although she does appear to be clean shaven on the pic where she's showin' her butt) but the context makes this collection. :D
|
Negative no no.
3 Attachment(s)
This sort of fits with the "whoops" theme. I love to see when posters use the negative function to 'blur' their wife's face. Do they not realize that it is pretty easy to undo that? Then again, maybe they do and that is another way that they can post pics of their faces and if their recognized they have an out. :D
Any other similar pics out there? |
forgot to blur
10 Attachment(s)
Found this on in a yahoo folder some time ago.Her name is Shelly_c
|
more of Shelly_c
10 Attachment(s)
and more
|
10 Attachment(s)
and more
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.