One Click Chicks Forum

One Click Chicks Forum (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/index.php)
-   Exhibitionists & Public Voyeur (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   posing nude for older man (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?t=59458)

sal32 03-03-2008 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yellowsubmarine (Post 396089)
the second pic is definitely from lvpanty.com/preview

(you need to put www in front of my link for it to work)

nice work!
the photo is almost 5 yrs old, dated 4/07/2003 11.36am

and if you look carefully, you can tell the lvpanty.com logo has been paintbrushed off as there's still a few black dots that were missed.

care to explain connie??

Klondike 03-03-2008 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sal32 (Post 396110)
nice work!
the photo is almost 5 yrs old, dated 4/07/2003 11.36am

and if you look carefully, you can tell the lvpanty.com logo has been paintbrushed off as there's still a few black dots that were missed.

care to explain connie??

Partly what threw me was that "she" was thanking all the replies - something I wasn't sure an imposter would do.

yeah, it occured to me all along, but what the heck - my philosophy is basically (as with jb and others) is to go along because the rewards are potentially great if its the real deal. I don't worry about being labeled a fool or a sucker. I am comfortable knowing i am not, and others should be too.

nice work, guys -

Klondike

squirrel516 03-03-2008 01:39 PM

Its possible that Connie could be real, but unwilling or afraid to post pictures of herself. The pictures taken by the photographer were probably never meant for everyone on the internet. Hence, Connie might have chosen pictures that she felt represented the type of pictures she has posed for with her neighbor.

stevin6 03-03-2008 01:54 PM

I guess Squirrel may be right. I also saw that she thanked every answer. That person, Connie, is very stupid, with something loss in his/her head if it is all set up and fake. And i don't think so. May be only the pictures or only the second one is fake.
But you see, you can't mislead the members here. :)

Klondike 03-03-2008 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by squirrel516 (Post 396230)
Its possible that Connie could be real, but unwilling or afraid to post pictures of herself. The pictures taken by the photographer were probably never meant for everyone on the internet. Hence, Connie might have chosen pictures that she felt represented the type of pictures she has posed for with her neighbor.

it is confusing because I did not get the sense that the two photos were taken by the same photographer, but yet that butt looked sort of the same in each. The first pic did look like the sort of photo an old studio photog might take of a new model. But the second looked more like standard porn.

Klondike

Tom/Jen 03-03-2008 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klondike (Post 396261)
it is confusing because I did not get the sense that the two photos were taken by the same photographer, but yet that butt looked sort of the same in each. The first pic did look like the sort of photo an old studio photog might take of a new model. But the second looked more like standard porn.

Klondike

Figured as much. You have to encourage them anyway just incase. You see these games all the time.

T

susansusan 03-04-2008 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by squirrel516 (Post 396230)
Its possible that Connie could be real, but unwilling or afraid to post pictures of herself. The pictures taken by the photographer were probably never meant for everyone on the internet. Hence, Connie might have chosen pictures that she felt represented the type of pictures she has posed for with her neighbor.

Thats remarkably optomistic, but could be true. In fact, a lot of things could be true:

1. As quoted above- Connie is a 19 year old girl who has posed for a neighbour, but simply choose to post phoney pictures.

2. Connie is a 19 year old girl, who has a sexual fantasy about posing for an older man. In this case- please feel welcome at these forums. There is nothing wrong with enjoying a fantasy.

3.Connie is an older woman, living out a fnatasy of being an attractive teenager. As above- feel welcome to these forums, but its best to be honest I think- this isn't a story/roleplay site.

4. Connie is a male, enjoying a sexual fantasy about being an attractive female.

5. Connie is simply a hoxer, probably a man, sharing phoney pictures, and phoney sexual fantasies "for a laugh."



Me, I think connie is female, probably doing it for a genuine sexual thrill.

I don't see why a man would pretend to be a straight woman- most males pretend to be "hot lesbians" for obvious reasons. Also I don't think a gay man would pretend to be a straight woman- there is a lot of stuff for gay men online already (and why would a gay man be on a site like this in the first place?)

P2003 03-04-2008 10:34 AM

I didn't buy it for a second but have a policy to not note these things, in case I am wrong. I would hate to be the one to prevent a new batch of legit photos from appearing here. But I am always grateful for actual evidence to prove it one way or another, so thanks.

skidmarc 03-04-2008 05:43 PM

Lucky man
 
Wish I had a neighbour like you. I'd love to take some classy nude shots but can't get anyone to model! I know I'd be fantastic as you have to enjoy what you do to be good. I've even offered to pay for models but to no avail. Your photos and you are really fab, keep it up (u are here ha):D

Uncle_Bud 03-05-2008 12:40 AM

Thank You very much Connie
 
I appreciate your honesty and sincerity


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Forum RulesTerms of UseTerms of ServiceDMCA18 U.S.C. § 2257RTA VerifiedPrivacy Policy